Comments are by Councilmembers Llatetra Brown Esters and Susan Whitney and are not approved or sanctioned by the City of College Park.
Presentation on Edmonston Road Sidewalk Project – Brian Morgan, Vice President/Director of Site Development and Rich Hayes – Senior project Engineer, GPI
The 2016 City of College Park Complete and Green Streets Policy identified Edmonston Road as a priority sidewalk in its goal of creating a continuous network of safe streets. The sidewalk will be constructed on the east side of the roadway. Click here to see the presentation.
Councilmember John Rigg thanked City Engineer Steve Halpern and former Councilmember Robert Day for their leadership on the project and said it’s been a priority for District 3 for 6 –10 years. He thought it a strong proposal and asked if Berwyn Heights had been asked about building a sidewalk to connect to the one proposed in the plan. Halpern said that hadn’t yet been done, so Rigg volunteered to start the conversation.
Rigg asked GPI Consultant Brian Morgan if the proposed trees were to be planted in City Right of Way (ROW) and was told that they were. Rigg responded that they’ll have to work collaboratively with residents to pave the way for those plantings because he thinks many don’t think of the ROW as such, but, rather, as part of their property.
Councilmember Stuart Adams said he was excited about the project. He asked if there are any features included in crosswalks to ensure pedestrian safety, such as raised crosswalks, a flashing light, etc. Morgan said the crosswalks will be well-marked but that there are no distinct traffic calming sections at this point but that they’re working at the Council’s direction and will implement whatever it would like.
Adams said he’d like the design to incorporate traffic calming measures and perhaps a safe refuge for pedestrians in the middle of crosswalks.
According to Mayor Patrick Wojahn, a revised plan should be back before the Council in about a month.
The following items on the Consent Agenda passed unanimously:
22-G-30 Approve scopes of work for City of College Park Storm Water System Assessment Project – Steve Halpern, City Engineer
22-G-32 Approval of grant funding from ARPA funds for College Park’s first due fire stations: Branchville Volunteer Fire Company & Rescue Squad; College Park Volunteer Fire Department; and Berwyn Heights Volunteer Fire Department & Rescue Squad, Inc., in the amount of $50,000 each for a total of $150,000 – Gary Fields, Director of Finance
22-G-35 Approval of Minutes from the December 14 Regular Meeting and Mayor and Council Inauguration; the January 18, 2022 Special Session; and the January 25, 2022 Regular Meeting.
22-G-34 Ratification of a new three-year Agreement (July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2025) between the City of College Park, Maryland and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1209C, AFL-CIO, and authorization for the City Manager to sign the new Agreement.
22-G-36, Parking prohibition along the 3500 block of Duke Street. (This item was added to tonight’s consent agenda per a requested amendment at the beginning of the meeting by Councilmember Mitchell) Public Works staff notified the City that their service trucks are having a very difficult time negotiating the tight curve on Duke Street between 3508 and 3512. They requested the parking prohibition along the inside of the curve for safety.
ACTION ITEMS
22-G-15 Approval of the amended and restated Declaration of Condominium and Site Plan for One College Park Condominium (City Hall)
Approval of the Declaration passed unanimously without discussion. The elements that had been amended and restated had been considered and agreed upon at the January 11th Council Meeting.
22-R-04 Adoption of Resolution Of The Mayor And Council Of The City Of College Park To Establish A City Redistricting Commission To Review And Recommend The Appropriate Reapportionment Of The City Council Districts And To Formulate The Charge To The Commission
Councilmember Kate Kennedy commented that she believes the Council’s main charge is to ensure that the redistricting is impartial, fair and transparent, saying that we need to appoint commissioners who’ll look at the data in a fair, transparent way. She stated her opinion that no one who’s planning to run or has held office should be on the Commission, saying that is a best practice.
The resolution passed unanimously as written.
22-O-01 Adoption of Ordinance Of The Mayor And Council Of The City Of College Park, To Adopt A Corrective Amendment To City Code Chapter 119, “Refuse, Solid Waste And Special Trash” By Repealing And Re-Enacting §119-6, “Collection Of Bulky Trash, Special Trash, And Overweight, Oversized Or Improperly Sorted Items,” To Clarify That Bulky Trash Collections Are Counted Based On Fiscal Year, Not Calendar Year, For Any One Property.
Counsel Ferguson stated that the ordinance is a simple change of one word from “calendar” year to “fiscal” year.
The ordinance passed unanimously.
22-O-02 Introduction of Ordinance 22-O-02, An Ordinance to amend the Fiscal Year 2022 Budget (FY 2022 Budget Amendment #2) to transfer the recovery of lost revenue of $10M from the ARPA allocation. The Public Hearing will be held on March 8 at 7:30 p.m.
Director of Finance Gary Fields explained that most local governments have been making this choice and that doing so doesn’t reduce any money that would go toward project goals for ARPA funds; he said it actually gives us more flexibility in spending that money.
The ordinance was formally introduced, and the public hearing will be held at the March 8th City Council Meeting at 7:30 pm.
22-O-03 Introduction of Ordinance 22-O-03, an Ordinance Of The Mayor And Council Of The City Of College Park, Amending Chapter 175 “Taxation”, Article IV, “Revitalization Tax Credit”, §175-10 “Eligibility Criteria” To Authorize The Mayor And Council To Approve A Level Two Tax Credit For A Property That Has Received Authority From Prince George’s County For A Payment In Lieu Of Taxes Under §7-506.1 Of The Taxation-Property Article, Annotated Code Of Maryland.
This would add another category of housing that could be eligible for a level 2 Revitalization Tax Credit. It would add on the requirement for affordable housing. The City is allowed to choose its own criteria for the level 2 tax credit, which would extend the 60% tax credit from 5 to 15 years. To be considered for the credit the property has to have first received authority from Prince George’s County for a Payment In Lieu of Taxes (PILOT).
The ordinance was formally introduced, and the public hearing will be held at the March 8th City Council Meeting at 7:30 pm.
22-G-33 Approval of a Contract of Sale for 4704 Calvert Road, College Park.
The contract was unanimously approved as written.
22-O-04 Introduction of 22-O-04, An Emergency Ordinance Of The Mayor And Council Of The City Of College Park Authorizing The Acquisition Of Certain Property Located At 4704 Calvert Road, College Park, Maryland, For A Public Purpose
City Manager Kenny Young presented the emergency ordinance, saying that the Council might consider authorizing the purchase of the property at 4704 Calvert Road in the interest of working toward two of its stated goals: preserving and enriching our environment and fostering and sustaining an affordable and stable City for individuals and families to live, work, play and retire. He said that there had been an error in the documents presented in the packet and stated that the lot is 14,560 sq ft rather than 13 thousand sq ft. He said that such parcels in Old Town and Calvert Hills are rare. He further explained that the City would save $50 thousand if the purchase were finalized on or before March 17, 2022, and that, were the emergency ordinance were to pass, the Phase 1 environmental survey would start on February 23rd. The price goes up the $1.75 million after March 17th.
There was a lot of Council discussion on this proposed purchase.
Councilmember Fazlul Kabir asked if Open Space funds would be appropriate for the project. Young explained that, in the interest of maximum flexibility, the funds would come from CIP, saying the open space program has very stringent requirements and that the discussion about exactly what we’ll do with this property will be a public process.
Kabir asked how we arrived at the 1.7 million figure? Had there been a formal assessment? Young explained that County appraised value is usually lower than actual appraised value. The City will go through the appraisal process, he said, but there are no comparative sites. The original asking price was $1.8 million, but the City was able to talk the seller down to a possible $1.7 million if it gets it done soon. What’s not figured in is additional rental income from the existing property of $48k per year. He added that you have to have a seller’s permission to do the appraisal; he doesn’t know that the appraised value is going to come back as what we have to pay for this property. He thinks the City might have to pay a bit of a premium to secure it, but not a lot. He confirmed for Kabir that if the City moved forward tonight, it could still back out of the deal were its due diligence to find the property didn’t merit the purchase price.
Councilmembers Denise Mitchell and Maria Mackey both spoke of transparency, with Mackey urging her fellow councilmembers to forward any resident questions to staff prior to the March 8th public hearing, and Mitchell saying that hearing would be where staff could answer additional questions and share results of its due diligence. Mitchell continued that there are times when we have to act to move our city forward and said Council would be communicating with residents about what they want.
Councilmember Adams made the motion, which was unanimously approved. He continued that he thinks the potential purchase presents a unique opportunity to fulfill City objectives for green space and affordable housing and that we have to act swiftly, but smartly, since we’re in one of the fastest moving markets in the US.
Audience comments:
A College Park resident who rents at the property in question wanted the Mayor and Council to keep in mind that renters are valuable residents. The resident said that the current landlord hasn’t raised the rent, which is less than market rate, and says if a private buyer were to purchase the property, the rent would likely double, and the resident might no longer be able to afford to live in College Park.
College Park’s Elaine Bitt was trying to understand why the city was so intent on buying this land and what the city is afraid will happen on this property if they don’t buy it. She continued that the City has plenty of open space buts needs affordable housing.
Resident Mary King said she was the stunned at the purchase price of property, that $1.7 million would be a steep price for a park and that she doesn’t understand what the city would be doing with residential development.
Resident Mary Cook said she didn’t understand why this had to be such a fast process. She thinks the sellers would work with the City and Economic Development Manager Michael Williams to select developers that would work with the City to develop this property as it wishes without costing taxpayers anything.
Additional Councilmember comments:
Adams acknowledged that it is a quick process but said we’d have additional discussion. He said the numbers spoke for themselves. He wants workforce housing on this property, but wants public input on that. He stated his belief that the property would go for much more on the open market, which could lead to higher rents for the people on that property.
Rigg said he’d received multiple written messages in favor of the purchase. To the caller who asked what Council feared would happen to the property if the City didn’t buy it, He answered, “that this key location in the middle of old town could easily be changed into low density single-family housing with low-quality construction, high prices and a 30-40 year lifetime.” He also pointed out that the City spent $1.6 million on a smaller lot in the past, so such purchases aren’t unprecedented.
Councilmember Esters asked how many times the City would have an opportunity to consider a purchase like this that would meet some of our strategic goals. She said a great opportunity has been brought to us.
Councilmember Whitney made the point that residents commonly lament the lack of control the City has in what kind of development comes to the City. She says this is a rare opportunity to exert control.
Councilmember Kabir asked again what the hurry was. City Counsel Ferguson said the City negotiated for the longest due diligence period it could get, and Young said that the owner has multiple investors and wants to move quickly. He reiterated that the City could save $50 thousand by closing on or before March 17th.
Kennedy stated that the timeline was reasonable. She said the Council just completed an in-depth planning process that put affordable housing as a primary goal, and this is taking action on that. She said affordable workforce housing would not be a private developer‘s priority and said it is appropriate for the City to act like a business sometimes.
Rigg said this is the City’s opportunity to provide an example of mission-oriented development. He said that if we do this right, we could set an example of what’s possible in this city.
Mayor Wojahn closed by saying that he hears the criticism about the process. He said the private sector moves very fast, so the City doesn’t always have as much time as it would like to make decisions. He said Council has discussed its goals and that if it wants to see change, it sometimes has to act. He thanked City staff for being proactive.
The Motion to introduce the emergency ordinance carried unanimously, and the public hearing will be held at the March 8th City Council Meeting. It is being put forward as an emergency ordinance to avoid the 20-day wait after the ordinance passes and, hopefully, save the City $50 thousand dollars.
Click here to see the meeting agenda for February 22, 2022.
Click here to view the Mayor and Council Regular Meeting held on February 22, 2022.
Click here to see the agenda for Mayor and Council Work session scheduled for March 1, 2022.