Due to the forecasted rain for Saturday morning, the 3rd Annual Berwyn Egg Hunt will now take place at 3pm on Saturday.Join your neighbors for this fun family event! The event will kickoff at 3pm at the pavilion in the Berwyn Neighborhood Park (Cherry Park). Find a golden egg to receive a special prize! One golden egg will be hidden for each age group.

2023 SPECIAL ELECTION 
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 

2023 SPECIAL ELECTION CANDIDATE GUIDE

Petition for Candidacy for Mayor 
Authorization of Candidacy Form
Appointment and Acceptance of Treasurer for Candidate 
Campaign Finance Report
Financial Disclosure Statement Form #2 Candidates 
Authorization of Electronic Filing  
Additional Candidacy Information 

Aviso de elección especial Candidatura a la Alcaldía  Información

Early Voting 
Tuesday, May 2, 2023
8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
Davis Hall, 9217 51^st Avenue, College Park, MD  20740

Election Day 
Saturday, May 6, 2023 
10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
City Hall, 7401 Baltimore Avenue, Community Room 1^st Floor, College Park, MD  20740

Vote By Mail 

Application (English)

To receive an absentee ballot by mail for the Special Election, complete an application and return it to City of College Park, Board of Election Supervisors, P.O. Box 626, College Park, MD 20741, or to one of our secure Ballot Drop Boxes: 

• Davis Hall: 9217 51^st Avenue, near the front door of building. 
• Hollywood Shopping Center, on the corner by Mom’s. (Will be available on Thursday, March 30th)
• On Campus: west side of Stamp Student Union on Union Lane, next to the USPS/FedEx Drop Boxes. (Will be available on Thursday, March 30th)
• City Hall:   7401 Baltimore Avenue, on the Yale Avenue entrance side of the building.

We must receive this application by April 26 to allow time to mail your ballot.  Starting April 27, you may apply in person for a ballot at 7401 Baltimore Avenue, Suite 201, between 9:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Monday-Friday.

INFO

The City Clerk’s Office handles all election-related information. 

240.487.3501
election@collegeparkmd.gov

In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act,  if you need special assistance, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 240-487-3501 and describe the assistance that is necessary.

In 2022, some Council District boundaries were redrawn as a result of redistricting. The new Council District map is available here.

VOTER REGISTRATION 

LAST DAY TO REGISTER TO VOTE IN THE SPECIAL ELECTION:  TUESDAY, APRIL 18, 2023 

If you are already registered to vote with the Prince George’s County Board of Elections at your current City address, you are automatically registered to vote in the City Election.  However, if you have moved or changed your name since the last election, you must update your Voter Registration with current information.

There are several ways to register to vote:

1. You can complete an Online Voter Registration Application provided by the State Board of Elections at Voter Registration (maryland.gov)
2. You can obtain a Voter Registration Application at any of the following:
   1. Motor Vehicles Administration 
   2. Any City Building Monday – Friday from 9:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. 
3. You can request a voter registration application by phone with the Prince George’s County Board of Elections at (301) 341-7300 or the City of College Park at 240-487-3501. 
4. You can visit the Prince George’s County Board of Election office at 1100 Mercantile Lane, Suite 115A, Largo MD 20774.    Office hours are 8:00 a.m. – 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday
5. You can download and mail in a completed application  English Voter Registration Application (PDF), Spanish Voter Registration Application (PDF)

For additional information visit: the Board of Election for: County Website or the State Website

Haga clic aquí para leer esta publicación en español.

STATE OF THE CITY REPORT

Mayor Pro Tem Denise C. Mitchell

The State of the City Report was given prior to the start of the Council meeting on March 21 at 7pm.  Click here to see the presentation

City of College Park Council Meeting Highlights – March 21, 2023

Comments are by Councilmembers Llatetra Brown Esters and Susan Whitney and are not approved or sanctioned by the City of College Park.

ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENTS – MAYOR, COUNCIL, STUDENT LIAISON

• In honor of Women’s History month, Councilmember Kabir recognized the five women currently serving on council. 
• Councilmember Kennedy recognized the holy holiday of Ramadan and extended good wishes to those who observe.
• Councilmember Esters acknowledged University of Maryland Basketball for their participation in March Madness and gave a special shout out to Maryland Women’s Basketball Team for making it to the Sweet 16 (Update: Maryland Beat Notre Dame on March 25 and go on to the Elite 8. Go Terps!).
• Councilmember Whitney acknowledged Ms. Kiaisha Barber, the Director for Youth and Family Services, for her work and effort to keep a family in their home.  She mentioned that the ongoing work and effort of staff on a day-to-day basis may not always be evident to members of the community.  
• Councilmember Mackie encouraged residents to register and vote in the upcoming elections. (Note:  Special election to be held on May 6 with Early voting on May 2 and the regular election will be held on November 5) 
• Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell shared the March Madness bet she made with the mayor of West Virginia.  Although Maryland beat West Virginia, she wanted to display the flag for West Virginia to show solidarity. She mentioned she will display the flag for Alabama at the next Council meeting for another March Madness bet lost. The Terps lost to Alabama on March 18.  

CITY MANAGER’S REPORT

Mr. Young informed residents that the City will be holding a special election for the position of mayor and that preparations are being made. Ballots will be finalized once all candidates are confirmed and many ballot boxes are out. He mentioned early voting will be held on Tuesday May 2 and election day will be on Saturday, May 6 at City Hall. Questions can be directed to the Office of the City Clerk.  

The City’s “Egg-ceptional Egg Hunt Egg-stravaganza” will be held on Saturday, March 25 from 10 -2pm and registration is required for participation. Learn more and register at https://CollegeParkEggHunt2023.eventbrite.com.

Mayor and Council Budget Worksession will be held on Saturday, March 25 beginning at 8am.  Tuesday, March 28 will be held for additional meeting time, if need be (Update:  Council will not meet on Tuesday, March 28).

PROCLAMATIONS AND AWARDS  

Proclamation celebrating the retirement of  Terry Schum, Director of Planning and Community Development

CONSENT AGENDA 

23-G-56 Approval of a FY23 MHAA Grant Agreement for the “Lakeland Community Heritage Augmented Reality Tour Phase II” and authorization for the City Manager to sign the grant documents –Terry Schum, Director of Planning

23-G-57 Approval of minutes from the February 28, 2023, meeting

Motion to adopt the consent agenda made and seconded.  

ACTION ITEMS

23-O-02 Introduction of Ordinance 23-O-02 to Amend Chapter 190, “Zoning,” due to adoption of the new County Zoning Ordinance and new requirements for granting variances and departures– Suellen Ferguson, City Attorney. The motion to introduce the ordinance was made, then seconded. The Public Hearing Will Be Held on April 11, 2023 at 7:30 p.m.

PRESENTATIONS AND WORKSESSION DISCUSSIONS 

Presentation of proposed Aging in Place Home Repair Program and Agreement with Habitat for Humanity Metro Maryland – Terry Schum, Director of Planning and Kiaisha Barber, Director of Youth, Family and Senior Services 

Ms. Schum expressed her excitement about this because it would implement the first aging-in-place renovation program in the city. The City has previously set aside $300,000 and worked with Habitat for Humanity (Habitat) to develop a plan and guidelines. Habitat has worked on similar projects in the county, including one in Hyattsville. To be eligible, residents will need to be at least 62 years old, own their home, and lived in the city for at least one year.  

This is the City’s program and the City can target income if we would like to prioritize those at 50% AMI or those living in particular communities, like Lakeland. College Park would give Habitat the money as an ARPA subrecipient and Habitat will run the program and keep the City informed. Habitat for Humanity is excited to partner with the City.  

Habitat for Humanity International has been around since 1976, they are the world’s largest non-profit builder and are solely focused on homeownership. They have been working in Prince George’s and Montgomery Counties since 1982. Their work ranges from new construction, rehabilitation, and home preservation. They have been working on home preservation for the past 13 years and have four full-time staff members dedicated to that. 

Habitat has many internal preservation programs including General Home Repairs, Veterans Home Repair and Weatherization. The ultimate goal of the preservation program is to preserve affordable housing.  

Their partnership with Hyattsville includes a focus on aging in place and providing accessibility for those with disabilities. Hyattsville’s program, CAPABLE/RAMP, launched in 2019 and focused on accessibility and other health and safety modifications. The program, which includes the engagement of an occupational therapist, is open to seniors and those with disabilities. It offers up to $15,000 for repairs and an additional $12,000 for weatherization. The program has shown significant improvement in daily living and a drop with depressive symptoms. For the proposed College Park program, Habitat is asking that funds be made available to engage an occupational therapist. 

Habitat has also partnered with Prince George’s County to offer the Prince George’s County Home Preservation Program (PG HOPP). The program, which has 39 projects currently underway, gives priority to those who have been in the community for more than 7 years and who are under 50% of AMI. The program is of no cost of homeowners.  

The College Park Program would focus on older adult homeowners aging in place who are 62 and older and earn less than 80% of uncapped AMI. These individuals should be in their home for at least 5 years after completion. The workflow for the program would begin with a submission of inquiry. If funds are available, residents will receive an application. Once the application is completed and submitted, Habitat will review and approve the application. Habitat would then conduct a home visit and create a scope of work; sign an agreement with the homeowner on scope of work; coordinate a subcontractor to bid the work; and finally, oversee the contractor and verify their work.

Councilmember Whitney asked how participants will be determined. She was told there would be widespread marketing and that Habitat staff would work closely with the City to determine who should be targeted.   

Councilmember Esters asked if repairs needed far exceed available funding, how that is handled and communicated with the homeowner. She was told that a plan of repair is created and funds are used to ensure the home is made as safe as possible. The homeowner would be informed and directed to other resources.

Councilmember Kabir asked how Hyattsville funded their program. He was told that the Hyattsville received grant funding and Habitat applied for state grants to extend the program.  

Councilmember Adams asked about homeowner education and assistance. Specifically, how they help the homeowner with the process and how much they address other things that may arise, like the need for home insurance. He was told that Habitat provides guidance on home maintenance but not homeowners insurance. They said the City could request that be included in participant education. Councilmember Adams also asked about eligibility for those who are the primary owners who live in the house with someone who is older. He was told that the City would set those parameters.

Councilmember Rigg expressed concern about the use of a webform for older residents who may not be as technologically savvy. He asked if Youth Family & Senior Services (YFS) might step in to assist those who may have difficulties. Ms. Barber said the Seniors Program would be involved, and she would suggest a paper form also be made available.   

Councilmember Kennedy asked Habitat representatives what they anticipated as the greatest challenge with this proposed program in College Park. Habitat said it was getting the programs off the ground, then having enough money to support the numbers of people who apply.

Councilmember Mackie asked about the prioritization of needs because some seniors need a lot to be done. She was told there is a focus on health and safety, and owners are asked for their top priorities. The occupational therapist also plays a role in helping to develop a plan.  Ms. Mackie asked if there would be interest in getting volunteers from the City and the University of Maryland, and she was told yes.   

Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell said it would be helpful to have an internship through the program and asked for suggestions on finding ongoing funding. Terry Schum mentioned Community Legacy state funding and the Community Development Block Grant. 

Councilmember Esters asked if an individual could only apply once or can they apply more than once to get to the maximum funding amount of $30,000. She was told that Habitat normally gives a 7-year waiting period for recipients to reapply, but the City can implement their own criteria.

Councilmember Whitney asked if Lakelanders can be prioritized as part of restorative justice.  She expressed her understanding that those who have lived in the city longer have a level of priority, as well, but wanted to ensure that Lakelanders who fall between 50 and 80% AMI have equal priority as those below 50% AMI. 

Upon discussion, Council agreed to prioritize those below 50% AMI and Lakelanders at or below 80% AMI first, and City residents at or below 80% AMI who have lived in the city for at least 25 years second. City Attorney Suellen Ferguson will create an MOU with Habitat that will be brought to Consent at a future meeting.

Presentation of City Survey Results – Ryna Quiñones, Communications and Events

Manager 

Ms. Quiñones said the Community survey was launched last fall. It was a 7-page survey that took approximately 15-20 minutes to complete. The demographics of those who completed the survey were reflective of our population.  

Councilmember Whitney said she assumed we’d consider results for satisfaction when deciding areas in which to focus attention and money for the next two years. She pointed out some divergence between satisfaction with various City services listed under Q3. Satisfaction with Major Categories of City Services [on pages 16-17 of the survey report] versus the ranked choice results under Q4. City Services That Should Receive the Most Emphasis Over the Next Two Years [pages 18-19 of the survey report], asking that we consider both lists when deciding how to spend city funds.

Councilmember Esters asked if the current survey and last year’s survey could be placed together on the website for comparison. Ms. Quiñones said that would be done. 

Councilmember Kabir said he was not surprised by the satisfaction with Public Works or resident concerns about traffic and crime prevention. He asked whether we should Geocode safety by district.  Ms. Quiñones indicated that districts were geocoded, and that information could be found in the report online.  

Ms. Quiñones said the survey is a snapshot in time and we need to consider the survey overall to gain a sense of how residents feel about living in the city.  

Councilmember Adams said he was happy to hear that the different departments will take a look at the data. He acknowledged that Friday Night Live got 99% satisfaction rating from residents who said they would return. He is interested in hearing from those ages 18-35 to hear what they had to say. He asked if it is possible to break our responses by age group.  

Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell asked if departments could share points from the survey during our budget worksession this weekend. Mr. Young said departments had already seen the survey results and would be prepared to speak to priorities during the budget worksession. 

Councilmember Kennedy said she appreciated the benchmarking that was done. She added the last survey was incorporated into the strategic planning process and asked if this survey was done differently. She also mentioned she accessed the link to the survey but did not see comments. Ms. Quiñones said there were open-ended questions that were answered by residents and the responses should be accessible. She mentioned the disconnect between people feeling safe overall but wanting us to focus on crime more. She said there could be a variety of factors that contributed to responses, saying we should further analyze those areas that are below average.  

Councilmember Mackie thanked residents for completing the survey. She mentioned her interest in council working with our partners in the county on some areas, like education. 

Councilmember Rigg said that he is not sure he agrees with the statistical validity of the last two surveys, saying the results are skewed toward homeowners. He thinks we should actively seek responses from renters, UMD students, and those with children the age of 17. 

Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell asked if this information can be included in the resident guide. Mr. Young said it would not be included in the upcoming guide that has already gone to print, but it can be included in the next guide.  

Discussion and possible action on legislation – Bill Gardiner, Assistant City Manager. Crossover date – date by which the bill must past in at least one side of the government, or it will be dead.  

Mr. Gardiner informed Council the State’s operating budget needs to approved by April 3 and then the Capital budget is to be approved. He said we are on track to get funding for the North College Park Community Center from the State and Park and Planning. HB459, the street light bill, was reported favorably, but in its amended form it limits what was to be accomplished by the bill. There is work underway to strip the amendment. 

SB114 – Property rate increase notice requirement – seems likely to pass. Rigg explained that the bill would modify the language municipalities must use in notifying residents that they are not adopting the Constant Yield Tax Rate (CYTR).

Councilmember Mackie noted that we did send a letter of support for SB77.

Our lobbyists will return to give us an overview after the session. 

REQUESTS FOR / STATUS OF FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

Councilmember Whitney asked about approval of community development grants.  Mr. Young said It is already on the list and anticipates it will be on the next meeting agenda.

COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE

Richard Biffle – non-resident, tax payer. He said many of the recent accomplishments in the City were due to ARPA funds. He said College Park is not an affluent city and there are rumblings that City does not receive enough tax money. He appreciates that the city considers big items but thinks we should focus attention on more municipal issues. He thinks we should look to the University of Maryland for increasing tax income and put more pressure on the State to fund more student housing. This would help us to help move students out of the neighborhood.  

Carol Macknis, resident of College Park – She appreciated the presentation on aging in place and the survey presentation. She said the survey said communication is good, but she believes it can be improved. She said the City should remember KISS (Keep it simple and straightforward). There are still seniors who have problems finding information. She recommends that the City redesign the website and assign residents as beta testers to see if things are working.  

COMMENTS FROM THE MAYOR, COUNCIL, STUDENT LIAISON OR CITY MANAGER

Councilmember Kabir commented on his facilitation of “If I Were Mayor” at Hollywood Elementary.  He mentioned the large turnout of 85 people.  

Councilmember Esters said she attended the COG Human Services Committee on March 10. It focused on local and national efforts to reduce Fentanyl supply and dealing with mental health. The DEA representative told participants that the DEA treat drug poisoning as a violent crime and are working to target those selling drugs laced with fentanyl. Unfortunately, there are many drug traffickers between Baltimore and Richmond, and it is hard to keep up due to the use of social media. One strategy that is being utilized is awareness programming for users. The program also featured a presentation from the Anne Arundel County Crisis Team on their successful effort to integrate mental health clinicians.  

Councilmember Rigg asked if we need to consider the attendance to COG meetings given the change in our composition.  

Councilmember Mackie  shared that COG’s Chesapeake Bay Water Policy meeting had a presentation from UMD’s Hughes Center that focused on the difference between a forest and tree canopy. She sent the City Manager links to maps that detail College Park’s tree canopy.

Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell mentioned the recent PGMA meeting with County Executive Alsobrooks and shared that 65% of County budget is geared toward education.  Stormwater management was also discussed during the meeting, and Calvert Hills was listed as an area where stormwater management efforts are being directed. The possibility of increasing the tax base for commercial properties was also a topic of conversation. There will be quarterly meetings with the County Executive moving forward.  

Mr. Young thanked Ms. Macknis for volunteering to be a beta tester. He said the City is working on making improvements to the website. He told Council they should have received materials for the budget meeting.  

MEETING ADJOURNED

Click here for the March 21st meeting agenda. Click here to watch the video of the State of the City and the March 21, 2023, meeting. 

Please Note:  The next meeting of Mayor and Council will be held on April 11.

Click here to see the agenda for the City of College Park Mayor & Council Hybrid Meeting on April 11, 2023 once it is finalized. Tune in, show up or share your thoughts/concerns about the following anticipated Presentations and Workshop discussions:

Discussion of the City’s Revitalization Tax Credit Program 

Development and Implementation of strategies to engage UMD students living in College Park

Comments are by Councilmember Susan Whitney and are not approved or sanctioned by the City of College Park.

Haga clic aquí para leer esta publicacion en español.

CITY MANAGER’S REPORT

Mr. Young mentioned the upcoming special election for Mayor to be held on May 6. Details can be found online at https://www.collegeparkmd.gov/181/City-Elections.  He thanked residents who have already signed up for curbside food waste pickup.  The City has increased its collection from .5 tons to 2.5 tons.  The City is still researching the vandalism of the City Hall Building (letters removed from building).  Based upon video footage it is believed to have been juveniles.   He recognized March 14 as International Pi Day and Equal Pay Day.  

AMENDMENTS TO AND APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 

Councilmember Whitney – Authorize the City Manager to approve up to a maximum of $10,000 per household ($50,000 in total FY23 funds) in emergency aid (food, shelter, rent, medical and dental expenses, transportation, utility bills) from the general fund contingency account (001-6510-510-8510) to assist current residents of the City of College Park. Added to Consent Agenda as 23-G-54.  

CONSENT AGENDA

23-G-51 Approval of an Animal Control Officer request for a letter of support for the grant application by Laurel Cats, Inc., Beltsville Community Cats (BCC), Bowie Citizens for Local Animal Welfare (Bowie CLAW), and Outlaw Kitties (OK) for funding under the Maryland Department of Agriculture’s Spay and Neuter program –Bob Ryan, Director of Public Services

23-G-52 Approval of Education Advisory Committee recommendations for Public School Education Grants – Kiaisha Barber, Director of Youth, Family and Senior Services, and Carolyn Bernache, EAC Chair

23-G-53 Approval of Minutes from the February 21, 2023, meeting

23-G-54 Authorize the City Manager to approve up to a maximum of $10,000 per household ($50,000 in total FY23 funds) in emergency aid (food, shelter, rent, medical and dental expenses, transportation, utility bills) from the general fund contingency account (001-6510-510-8510) to assist current residents of the City of College Park. Added to Consent Agenda as 23-G-54. 

The Consent Agenda was unanimously approved.

ACTION ITEMS

23-CR-01 Introduction of a Charter Resolution to amend Article III, “Mayor and Council”, §C3-5, “Election” and §C3-6, “Vacancies”; and Article IV, §C4-2, “Registration of Voters”, §C4-3, “Supervisors of Elections”, and §C4-4,“Other Election Officials”; to change the date that a Petition for Candidacy for a Mayor or Council vacancy must be withdrawn to two days after said petitions are due, provide that voter registration for City Elections shall close 15 days prior to an Election; provide that Supervisors of Elections will be appointed or re-appointed on or before June 30 of a non-election year with two year terms to begin on July 1 of that year, remove the requirement that City elections be conducted as nearly as practicable to Prince George’s County Elections, remove unnecessary provisions, make non-substantive corrections, and clarify other provisions – Suellen Ferguson, City Attorney The Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, April 11 at 7:30p.m. in the Council Chambers

23-O-04 Introduction of an Ordinance to amend Chapter 34, “Elections”, Article I, “General Provisions” §34-3, “Definitions”; Article II, §34-6, “Absentee Balloting”; And Article III, “Fair Election Practices”, §34-11, “Appointment Of Treasurer By Candidates And Political Committees”; To Redefine Ballot And Electronic Signature And To Define Mail-In Ballot, Reflect Maryland Law With Respect To Mail-In Ballots And Absentee Ballots, Accept Certain Signatures Electronically, Set A Time By Which Applications For Main-In Ballots Must Be Made, Make Provision That Qualified Voters Who Have Opted To Receive A Mail-In Ballot For Federal Or State Of Maryland Elections Will Automatically Receive A Mail-In Ballot For City Elections Without The Necessity Of Filing An Application and Clarify Who Can Be Appointed As A Treasurer For An Political Candidate – Suellen Ferguson, City Attorney. The Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, April 11 at 7:30p.m. in the Council Chambers

PRESENTATIONS AND WORKSESSION DISCUSSIONS 

College Park City-University Partnership Annual Report Presentation: Richard Wagner, Chair; Susan Hartmann, Executive Director; Valerie Woodall, Associate Executive Director; Daniel Cunningham, Community Preservation Trust Executive Director 

Richard Wagner introduced members of CPCUP staff including Susan Hartmann, Valerie Woodall, Daniel Cunningham, Kendra McAbee, and Beth Wool.

Susan Hartmann provided a year in review for 2022. Staff has grown quite a bit; they have grown to 150% from a staff of two (2) to a staff of five. The partnership recently celebrated 25 years. CPCUP recently received a $150,000 grant to support the homeownership program. To date, grants for 78 homes have been awarded since the program launched. They have also received $1,293,000 from MD to connect the Trolley trail to the Riverwalk along Campus Drive. 

The partnership has also received $15.8 in federal, State and local funding to start the Community Preservation Trust.  

Ms. Hartmann also provided a 2023 outlook for CPCUP. She shared that the partnership will be looking for opportunities to expand the homeownership program, coordination to move forward with design and construction to make improvements with connection to River Walk. Work for the Community Preservation Trust will continue; they have completed the legal guidelines to allow homeowners to purchase, now they want to focus on educating residents and purchasing five (5) homes. Trolley Trail Day will resume on June 10.  It will be held across the length of the trolley trail (Hollywood to Hyattsville). She explained that the overall goal for the partnership is increasing connection and improving marketing of College Park as a top-tier college town. She thanked Council for funding which helped them to proceed with their work, including $155,000 in funding from the City. They have focused on offering benefits to staff, securing computers and software, auditing and putting legal processes in place.  

Councilmember Kennedy acknowledged the work of CPCUP and those serving on the advisory committee for the Community Preservation Trust including Maxine Gross, Robert Thurston, and Llatetra Brown Esters. 

Daniel Cunningham, Director of the Community Preservation Trust, talked about the many parts involved in putting the Trust together. He mentioned how the Trust must first buy a home and then sell a home with a discount on the price of the home. He talked about the importance of taking the time to do this work right. He said they were leaning on the expertise of the City and volunteers. He informed the Council the trust is registered with the state and for homes purchased through the trust there will be a 99-year lease allowing a right of first refusal.  

Major Discussion points:

• Low inventory of homes in College Park and questions about how the City can leverage the trust to increase inventory.
• Resuming the Trolley Trail Day event which will go from Hollywood to Hyattsville.  
• Question about extending the Trolley Trail into Lakeland and consulting with members of the Lakeland community. 
• The development of the Trust to initially purchase home and eventually develop homes, including blighted properties.  
• The possibility of increasing the funding for the homeowner assistance program as housing costs increase. The current grant of $15,000 can be used in conjunction with City and County funding. 
• The challenge of countering offers from investors.  

Update on the Restorative Justice Commission (45) – Kayla Carter, Racial Equity Officer

Ms. Carter Provided the charge of the commission – restoration and reconciliation of Lakeland. She introduced the Restorative Justice Commission (RJC) consultants Dr. Barbara Ceptus Schreiber, Ms. Leah Williams, and Ms. Claudia Barragan.  

The consultants explained how they have talked with members of the community to understand what they would like to see. Their framework is centered around restoring those who have been most impacted by what has occurred. Race and racism need to be considered as we go through this work.   Understanding how harm has led to other atrocities. Restorative Justice is a large concept/model that requires a foundational understanding.   

Key Points from RJC Report:

• Timeline: the first year there has been a focus on aligning commissioners with an understanding of the concept.  It is important to take the proper amount of time for the process. It is vital that people understand that restorative justice should be the lens through which to work all the time, not just for the purpose of this particular process.  
• The Commission has created three committees for volunteer participation: Community Engagement; Truth & Reconciliation, and Restorative & Transformative Justice.
• Participation in UMD MMC Course helped to challenge their understanding about the importance of establishing an RFP to identify a researcher.  
• When the consultants speak of Lakelanders they mean those directly impacted by Urban Renewal and their descendants.  When they speak of Lakeland they mean Lakeland in its original form.  
• After meeting held on December 19, they believed they needed to reframe the focus. 
• Success Criteria established by the City for the work of the restorative justice committee was if 60% of the city’s population is aware of the efforts and deem it is health for the College Park community as a whole. The consultants assert that this assessment does not center on those directly impacted by the harm of Urban Renewal.
• After the December 19 meeting, consultants added transformative justice to the goals of the commission.  
• There is a pressure that consultants and commissioners have felt around the issue of development. It is hard for transformative justice to occur where this pressure to develop the community.
• The engagement with the MMC Class to use Lakeland was viewed as a positive outcome. The class report will be shared soon.  
• Requests from the Restorative Justice Commission (RJC) included the replacement of the position held by the former mayor. A request was made to Mayor Pro Tem to serve, and she accepted the request.  
• The importance of working through ethos of the steering committee to ensure alignment of the City.  

Major Discussion Points:

• The challenge of receiving historic designation. How was District 3 able to receive historic designation without design guideline, but Lakeland has not? Response from historic society indicates there is nothing historic about Lakeland, although they do mention the Lakeland High School. Consultants have a meeting scheduled with the Historic Preservation Director.   The receipt of historic designation for communities of color have been a challenge.  
• Consultants shared their belief there were Lakelanders who applied to be part of the Commission who were not chosen. Councilmembers countered that a concerted effort was made to accept Lakelanders who applied and to recruit as many Lakelanders as possible. Councilmembers requested that the original applications be reviewed to ensure that was accurate. After the meeting, the records were reviewed, and it was confirmed that all applicants with a connection to Lakeland were appointed. 
• Acknowledgment for way the December 19 meeting was held not to pressure attendees, but to allow for their exchange.  Acknowledgement that Lakelanders may in fact be exhausted from years of advocating for themselves. 
• The researcher to be identified through RFP process is to focus on documenting the record of harm done in the community and making recommendations that address the harm.  
• Concern about the timeline of the work and hope that action can be taken while information is gathered. 
• Faster is not better, but the City does not need to wait until the restorative justice framework to start making change.  

C. Discussion and possible action on legislation (10) – Bill Gardiner, Assistant City Manager

Mr. Gardiners reminded Council that the end of the session is April 10.  Mayor Pro Tem asked Council if there were any bills that were pressing. 

Councilmember Adams –  referenced SB11 and asked that we oppose the bill. Ms. Ferguson said the bill does not apply to the City but will research further.   

After further research, Ms. Ferguson explained that SB11 will affect the City’s ability to set speed limits around school zones. Right now, a city can reduce their speed limit to 15 mph within a half mile of a school without a traffic study. Passage if SB11 would limit that to 500 feet.  Councilmember Rigg said MML is opposed to the bill.

Councilmember Adams expressed his belief the bill passed in the house unanimously. Council voted to give staff authorization to write a letter in opposition. 

Visioning Workshop for Economic Development – Michael Williams, Economic Development Manager; and Stan Wall, Principal; Rachel Waldman, Director; and Danno Lemu, Analyst; from HR&A Advisors.

Mr. Williams introduced council to the framework for a visioning plan, saying he would collaborate with UMD, CPCUP, TDC and residents.

Major Points from Report:

• Data analysis conducted to understand existing conditions in College Park. The data identified a growing and diversifying housing stock, limited homeownership opportunities, and significant future investments.
• Consideration of how College Park leverages its identity, tax yield as compared to similar municipalities, increasingly connected transit hub, and job base reliance on the University of Maryland (UMD).  
• The importance of diversifying employment base outside of UMD.
• Heavily concentrated office tenants show a need to maintain existing tenants and attract new tenants.  
• The City needs to expand economic development tools and role.  

Major Discussion Points:

• Need to focus attention on attracting and maintaining residents between the ages of 30-39.
• Need to find the right balance for our economic development and ensure the City has the proper infrastructure.  
• The importance of influencing improvement to education to retain residents.  
• The need to focus on attracting and maintaining smaller businesses.  The possibilities of a pop-up space.  
• Need to focus on commuters…”I come for…and I stay for….
• City does not do a good job of providing housing for young professionals or market-rate housing for those aging in place. Housing preservation done right is a community retention strategy.  When our communities are gone what are they (e.g., Lakeland and Old Town).  There is a need to work with PGC on zoning and planning to make sure we are on target.  
• We need to understand our opportunity to collect more tax revenue from businesses. The use of the revitalization tax credit could be an issue. 
• The need for community input during this economic development envisioning process. 
• The City should focus on its needs to determine its economic development tools.  
• The City should consider how to maintain its culture as it continues to grow.  Consider what make College Park special and continue those things through our growth. 
• The need to consider how and where to maintain greenspace in our community.  

COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE 

Ms. Maxine Gross, resident of College Park – wonderful to watch us at work.  Asked Council to consider the situation in Lakeland in the strictest sense.  Two thirds of the community is gone by action of this body. We should not compare Lakeland to other neighborhoods in the city; it is not an accurate comparison. She encouraged others to participate in the walking tour. It is one thing to see information on a piece of paper versus seeing it in person and understanding the impact. When you look at the economic development report, consider what it means for Lakeland. Their business community was decimated due to action of this body. How can that be rectified? We all need to look at things differently through the lens of restorative justice. You don’t need Lakeland to tell you how they have been impacted when you can see for yourself. There are things that you as reasonable, caring people can do moving forward.  

Click here to watch the video of the March 14, 2023 meeting. Click here to see the meeting agenda for March 14, 2023.

Click here to see the agenda for the City of College Park Mayor & Council Hybrid Meeting on March 21, 2023. Tune in, show up or share your thoughts/concerns about the following Presentations and Workshop discussions:

• Discussion of proposed Aging in Place Home Repair Program and Agreement with Habitat for Humanity Metro Maryland
• Presentation of City Survey Results
• Discussion and possible action on legislation

Comments are by Councilmembers Llatetra Brown Esters and Susan Whitney and are not approved or sanctioned by the City of College Park.

Haga clic aquí para leer esta publicacion en español.

Councilmember Rigg made a motion to shift the order of the agenda to allow the City Manager to provide his report prior to Council announcement/comments.  The motion was seconded and approved.  

CITY MANAGER’S REPORT

Mr. Young acknowledged the challenging and heartbreaking time for city and council, in light of current events. He said the allegations against the former mayor were abhorrent. He went on to say we are one community and one College Park, and we will get through this time.    

ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENTS – MAYOR, COUNCIL, STUDENT LIAISON

Councilmember Adams mentioned attending a tour of the Discovery District with State Comptroller Brooke Lierman. He said he was excited to learn more about plans for the site and the businesses operating there. He thanked residents for attending the Edmonston Road Sidewalk Project meeting.

Councilmember Kabir mentioned the North College Park Civic Association (NCPCA) event held on Sunday, March 5 to bring members of the community together.  

Councilmember Kennedy said that the NCPCA event was held at Proteus Bicycles and Brews.  

Councilmember Esters mentioned the Lakeland Civic Association (LCA) in-person meeting to be held on Thursday, March 9 at 7pm at the College Park Community Center.  

Councilmember Whitney announced that Wednesday, March 8 is Giving Day for University of Maryland College Park.

Councilmember Rigg acknowledged the City Manager’s comments and said he too was grieving with members of the community. He encouraged residents to stay healthy and stay strong.

Councilmember Mackie thanked all who had offered prayers of support. She also encouraged residents to sign up for curbside food scrap pick-up.   

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Former College Park Mayor Andy Fellows was in the audience at City Hall.  

 PROCLAMATIONS AND AWARDS

 Women’s History Month

AMENDMENTS TO AND APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA

Councilmember Whitney made an amendment to split the consent agenda vote due to the need to recuse herself from the vote on agenda item 23-G-37 due to employment.  

Prior to public comment, Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell gave a statement asking individuals to be respectful of others and understand their time limit.  

 PUBLIC COMMENT ON CONSENT AGENDA AND NON-AGENDA ITEMS 

John Payne, resident of College Park, said City traffic studies seem to just be speed hump studies, which he doesn’t find effective for speed control, saying speed humps are as effective as potholes.  He said there were many alternatives, including planters, narrowing streets or lining streets with tree canopies.  

Andrew Fellow, Former Mayor and current resident, thanked the Council for their service now and through the weeks to come.  

Lori Provost, resident of College Park and owner and director of The Berwyn Ballet School shared appreciation for the opportunity to make a difference to youth within the city through her dance studio.  She mentioned having three studio locations with a total of 153 students. The studio offers 25 classes and makes dance accessible. In December 2022, they hosted a free production of Nutcracker at the Old Parish House. She expressed the hope of offering ballet in the park and complimentary classes. She thanked the College Park Arts Exchange and shared her pride to be in College Park. 

James LoBosco, Executive Vice President of Southern Management, said he stands with us as we work through this turbulent time. He said it’s important to focus forward.  

Regina Holbert, owner of Hair and Space Beauty Bar, said she was grateful to Economic Development Manager Michael Williams. She expressed her dismay with recent news but hopes that is does not cast a negative light on all the good happening in College Park.

Chloe Bastcsh, not a resident, was speaking on behalf of the landlord at Hollywood Shopping Center. She expressed appreciation to Council, the City and Michael Williams for everything they’d done for the them and their tenants, saying, “We have your back.” 

Gary Michael isn’t a resident of College Park, but his company has been involved in the City’s development. He said he believed the future is really bright for the City of College Park. He expressed his appreciation for the work of Michael Williams. 

Click here to view meeting agenda

 CONSENT AGENDA , Part I

23-G-45 Award the renewal of insurance contracts with Cigna for Health Insurance; with Dominion and MetLife for Dental plans; with Chesapeake Insurance for Workers’ Compensation; and with Local Government Insurance Trust for property and liability insurance, in a budgeted amount of $1,964,897.

23-G-46 Approval of requests for the following Traffic Studies: Request for a Traffic Calming Study for 4600 block of Clemson; Request for a Traffic Calming Study for Rhode Island Avenue between Calvert and Harvard Road; Request for a Traffic Calming Study on Roanoke Place & 51st Avenue between Berwyn Road & Roanoke Place (Ghost Kitchen traffic) – Steve Halpern, City Engineer

Passed unanimously.

CONSENT AGENDA , Part II

23-G-37 Approval of an amendment to the Property Use Agreement with The Hall to require compliance with the City noise ordinance restrictions, and approval of an Agreement with The Hall, the University of Maryland and the College Park City-University Partnership to enable live entertainment events at which patrons who are under the age of twenty-one (21) may remain after 9:00p.m., in substantially the forms attached, subject to review by the City Attorney – Bob Ryan, Director of Public Services and Suellen Ferguson, City Attorney

Passed with 7 in favor and one abstention.

ACTION ITEMS

23-G-50 Consideration of the Board of Election Supervisors recommendations for the Special Election for the office of Mayor –Janeen S Miller, City Clerk

Ms. Miller introduced the item by saying the City charter requires that we hold a special election by May 6th. The Board of Elections (BOE) wanted to use the maximum amount of time given that candidacy for the Mayor requires signatures from all four districts.  

Councilmember Kabir thanked Mr. Payne and the members of the Board of Elections for their work. He said that soon after the date was announced, a resident called asking why we are having an election on the day of a major event. He mentioned Rhode Island Ave would be blocked for the City’s parade. He acknowledged May 2nd has been proposed as an early voting day, but said residents see the actual voting day as the day to vote. He suggested moving the election date back to May 7^th. After it was explained that the charter requires voting no later than May 6^th, he suggested moving the parade day.  

Councilmember Adams asked about the mail-in option and wanted to hear more. Ms. Miller confirmed there will be mail-in voting and at least 3 drop boxes. They’re working to add a new box at the Hollywood Shopping Center. Adams said 65 days wasn’t enough time to start something new but encouraged us to look back at the special election after it’s over to consider whether rank choice voting could’ve been used. 

Councilmember Esters asked about the feasibility of changing the date of the parade. Ms. Quiñones said it would be difficult as it has already been promoted and they’ve started to confirm participants and submit road closure requests to SHA. She mentioned the challenges of identifying an alternative date that would allow enough time for planning and the level of participation the City seeks.  

Councilmember Rigg asked the City to work on a parking plan to accommodate residents voting at City Hall and said he shared interest in rank choice voting. Mr. Payne said it would be challenging to introduce such a change during the special election.   

Councilmember Mackie asked for clarity on how early voting would be done. Mr. Payne said early voting would simulate the regular voting day experience. Ms. Miller spoke to the security of the ballots, saying they’d be stored in single, double, and triple locked areas. They know how many ballots they have at the end of day and how many at the beginning of the next. They also use tamper-evident seals.

Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell asked if there were restrictions on when those running for the office could declare their candidacy. Ms. Miller said was no prohibition on declaring candidacy. 

Councilmember Kabir said we we’ll have to work to get the word out about the election and asked that the same level of importance be placed on the promotion of early voting. Mr. Payne said it was their intention to publicize election day, early voting, mail-in voting and drop boxes. He also asked Councilmembers to help spread the word.  

Councilmember Rigg said he believed we are going the right direction by promoting opportunities to use a variety of voting methods. 

Councilmember Mackie said she hopes all residents take advantage of the opportunity to vote. 

College Park resident Carol Macknis said there are many options to get from North College Park to City Hall other than Baltimore Ave. She said she appreciated Councilmember Rigg’s comments about parking accommodations. She thinks many people will choose to vote early at Davis Hall on Tuesday, May 2.  She asked that the City not mail ballots to residents because of ongoing issues with the post office, asking the City to consider emailing the ballots instead.  

David Greg, resident of College Park, thanked Councilmember Riggs for his comments about low mobility and asked about using the Community Center rather than City Hall. He shared his concern about councilmembers who run and the need to hold a second election or make an appointment to Council were they elected. He would not want someone appointed to be from a different district than that of the vacant seat nor would he want the appointee to be allowed to vote on the budget as they would not have been involved in the budget planning process. 

Ms. Ferguson said, should an appointment need to be made, the individual does not have to be from the same district and will have the same rights of all councilmembers. 

Councilmember Whitney asked if it would be possible for residents to pick up ballots rather than getting them through the mail. Ms. Miller said it is being discussed.  

23-G-47 Discussion and possible approval of the allocation of a $200,000 grant of ARPA revenue loss funds to the Iron Rooster restaurant to aid the hospitality industry in College Park, subject to Iron Rooster Hospitality, LLC entering into a Beneficiary Agreement insubstantially the form attached subject to review by the City Attorney – Michael Williams, Economic Development Manager

Mr. Williams expressed his excitement about Iron Rooster coming to the City. It would go into a space that is currently vacant and previously housed Kapnos. 

He discussed the distribution of $1.8 million in ARPA funds to 55 small businesses, 60 households and four non-profit organizations.

Mr. Algaze, restaurant founder, talked about the locations of Iron Rooster and its 220 employees. He mentioned his excitement about coming to the City and the pleasure of working with Mr. Williams.   

Councilmember Esters asked about how the grant dollar amount was determined. Mr. Williams said he worked with the owner to understand how much would be invested in the space, saying equipment might need to be replaced as it had been dormant for some time.  

Councilmember Adams spoke of his heartburn in the context of ARPA money. He wanted to identify ways to fund grants for businesses moving forward. He spoke of his interest in establishing a blighted property tax, the proceeds from which might sustain economic development grants.  

Mr. Williams spoke of the upcoming economic development visioning discussion and the need to develop tools. He added that the City has done a lot with ARPA funds outside of economic development.  

Councilmember Kabir said by not having an economic visioning workshop 3 years ago, Council had missed an opportunity to open up the funds to other businesses. Mr. Williams said he does not take his job lightly, saying he’s always thinking about whether one more call could make a difference. He said  there’s a lot of excitement about the Hollywood Shopping Center, and he talked about the need to prioritize when opportunities arise. 

Councilmember Mackie aksed about the cost of the space remaining vacant, and Mr. Williams said vacancies cut into the City’s tax revenue.  

James LoBosco said the hospitality industry had its best year in 2019 and its most devastating year in 2020; they’re still working to recover. If not for ARPA funding and the City Manager, Southern Hospitality would never have been able to attract such businesses. He said Southern Hospitality’s goal is to draw conferences away from DC, Silver Spring and Rockville. He knows $200,000 is a lot of money but explained it will help given the challenges in the space. The equipment may not be useable since it’s been sitting for five years. The grant will help to give a competitive advantage.  

College Park resident David Grey said he appreciated the challenges of the hospitality industry. However, he is fed up that residents have to pay more taxes because people aren’t towing the line. He would like to be shown how bringing these businesses help him as a resident. He thinks $200,000 is a lot of money.

Mr. Williams responded by saying we are working to make The Hotel a major attraction in the City and throughout the year we host people from around the country. College Park is in a special place, he said, and we need to use these funds to help solidify our economic development.  

Mr. Algaze said he would be employing city residents.  

Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell said that for as long as she has been on the Council, we have talked about the importance of attracting businesses that would employ our residents.  

PRESENTATIONS AND WORKSESSION DISCUSSIONS 

Discussion and possible action on legislation (10) – Bill Gardiner, Assistant City Manager

Councilmember Whitney asked Council to support three bills aimed at modernizing mental healthcare in Maryland, saying all were supported by both The Maryland Association of Youth Service Bureaus and the Mental Health Association of Maryland:  SB582/HB1148, SB534, SB3/HB271. Council voted unanimously to do so.

Councilmember Mackie asked about SB11 (Motor Vehicles in School Zones).  Mr. Gardiner said he has not done any additional research on this bill. Councilmember Adams said the bill has specific language about Prince George’s County, and Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell asked Mr. Gardiner for further research. 

Councilmember Whitney asked Council to send a letter in support of HB297/SB292 – Victims of Child Sex Trafficking and Human Trafficking – Safe Harbor and Service Response, elevated by Mitchell in previous meetings. Council voted unanimously to support.

HB0892/SB813 (Comprehensive Flood Management Grant Program) – Does not include College Park because we do not meet the threshold. There can be follow up with the delegate. Councilmember Rigg took no position on this legislation.  

Ms. Miller asked about the Maryland Municipal League’s (MML) position on HB104 (Municipality Charter Amendments).  Councilmember Rigg believed MML was in favor.  Ms. Miller said the City had no concerns.  

REQUESTS FOR / STATUS OF FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell asked whether the discussion on April 18 regarding Airbnbs could be moved up. The City Manager said we can consider the timeline and see what can be done, but it is a tight schedule. He would not make any commitment. Councilmember Whitney said she would like to be kept in the loop regarding this discussion as well.  

COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE 

Mr. Grey, resident of College Park, said he respected Mr. Williams’ job but believes there are other things we can do. He was born and raised in College Park and is frustrated by having his taxes raised. Many people do not like what the City is doing. He would like the city to focus on the residents. He said he may want to consider maintaining the constant yield tax rate.  

Mr. Tom Litkle, resident of College Park, asked if the economic development visioning will be open to the public. The City Manager said it would.

COMMENTS FROM THE MAYOR, COUNCIL, STUDENT LIAISON OR CITY MANAGER

Councilmember Kabir – On Sunday, March 5, he attended a North College Park Civic Association (NCPCA) gathering. Residents shared a number of feelings and emotions, but it’s time to come together as a community.  

Councilmember Kennedy – CPCUP is coming to give the annual report. The housing trust is coming along well.  

Councilmember Adams – Thanked folks for keeping discourse positive during the meeting.  

Councilmember Rigg – We are bigger than one person.   

SGA Liaison, Andriessens – thanked Council for their leadership during this time. 

City Manager –  Thanked staff, Mayor Pro Tem and Council for their work during this challenging time.   

Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell– said we are one College Park and will get through this.  

MEETING ADJOURNED

Click here to watch the video of the March 7, 2023 meeting. 

Click here to see the agenda for the City of College Park Mayor & Council Hybrid Meeting on March 14, 2023. Tune in, show up or share your thoughts/concerns about the following Presentations and Workshop discussions:

• College Park City-University Partnership (CPCUP) Annual Report Presentation
• Update on Restorative Justice Commission
• Visioning Workshop for Economic Development 

Comments are by Councilmembers Llatetra Brown Esters and Susan Whitney and are not approved or sanctioned by the City of College Park.

ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENTS – MAYOR, COUNCIL, STUDENT LIAISON 

Councilmember Kabir thanked Officer Lobin for his assistance with recent car-related crimes. 

Councilmember Esters acknowledged the start of Women’s History Month.

Councilmember Adams thanked staff for their work coordinating the Edmonston Sidewalk Project Community Meeting.  

SGA Liaison Andriessens mentioned the day of service and acknowledgement of Officer Richard Collins III, the Bowie State University student killed on University of Maryland campus.  

City Manager’s Report

The City Manager had no comments.

AMENDMENTS TO AND APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 

Motion and second to add closed session to the agenda.  

PUBLIC COMMENT on CONSENT AGENDA and NON-AGENDA ITEMS

Ethan Sweep, Community Liaison for Congressman Glenn Ivey, said Ivey’s office wants to help municipalities. He announced the release of their grants newsletter and encouraged councilmembers to email, call or visit their district office in Largo anytime. 

CONSENT AGENDA 

Click here to see meeting agenda.

23-G-41 Award of Miscellaneous Concrete Maintenance and Asphalt Resurfacing Contract CP-24-01 to NZI Construction Corporation, in the amount of $800,000, riding the competitively-bid Prince George’s County Asphalt Resurfacing and Related Roadway Improvements Contract # 932-H(F)D – Steve Halpern, City Engineer

23-G-24 Approval of contract price of $103,800 for Contract SP Arch agreement for College Park Woods Clubhouse architect and engineering services, to include structural design, permitting and contract administration

The Consent Agenda was unanimously approved. 

PRESENTATIONS AND WORKSESSION DISCUSSIONS 

Discussion of amendments to the City Zoning Chapter to conform to the new County ordinance = Suellen Ferguson, City Attorney and Terry Schum Director of Planning 

Ms. Ferguson said the City needs to make changes to its ordinances in response to the new county zoning requirements that went into effect in April 2022. City codes cannot be less stringent than the county codes, but they can be more stringent. Until changes are codified, we will need to follow the county’s zoning ordinances. Ms. Schum said the county fence code has become less restrictive in some ways (side yards on corners no longer considered front yards) and more restrictive in others (Chain link fencing no longer allowed). We may maintain our current city code that is more restrictive than the county regarding side yards, but our code has to be changed to reflect that chain link fencing is no longer allowed. The City Planning Department is still combing through what other changes might be needed.

Councilmember Rigg said the variance decisions look more stringent and asked if it will be more difficult for residents to receive variances. Ms. Schum indicated that the city’s ability to have some control in the variance process has made it easier, but the new zoning requirements will make it more difficult.  

Councilmember Kabir said some of the provisions in our code were more restrictive than the county and asked if we need to make changes. 

Ms. Ferguson said there are other changes to the County zoning requirements that will not be in the City code. For instance, the City did have some regulations regarding parking that the county did not.  These changes will need to come to Council for review. 

Councilmember Adams asked to confirm if zoning we were discussion was only residential. Ms. Schum said that was correct.    

Councilmember Whitney said she thought the change from defining a side yard as a front yard for corner lots was a good, saying it would help homeowners. Ms. Schum agreed.

Discussion and possible action on legislation (There is a possibility that the Council will vote on time sensitive matters) 

Mr. Gardiner, Assistant City Manager, spoke of the work that has been done to support upcoming legislation. He mentioned the upcoming hearing on Thursday, March 2 for HB1130/SB229 related to noise abatement monitoring systems, saying many have signed up to testify. He also mentioned hearings to be held the week of March 6, including  HB1209 on 3/8 and SB813/HB892 on 3/9.

Councilmember Mackie asked Council to consider supporting SB407/HB848 next week. She said the bill would create a potable reuse pilot program for drinking water, saying Maryland is behind other states on water reuse.

Councilmember Whitney motioned for legislation SB590 – Reclaim Renewable Energy Act.  Todd Larsen, outside of his role as Chair of the Committee for a Better Environment, asked Council to support this Maryland Sierra Club-supported bill. Mr. Gardiner said the bill was in line with other environmental stands Council has taken, saying it will eliminate what peoples see as mistakes, like allowing energy created by trash incineration to be counted as renewable.

 Councilmember Whitney also asked Council to consider supporting a series of bills aimed at modernizing Maryland’s mental health care system. Councilmember Rigg asked if the package of bills mentioned by Councilmember Whitney aligned with our strategic plan and mentioned concerns about staff bandwidth. He suggested both delving into the bill to understand exactly what aligns with the City’s mission to determine whether to support and checking with Youth, Family & Senior Services Director Kiaisha Barber to see if certain bills would particularly benefit College Park. Councilmember Whitney agreed with that plan of action. Councilmember Adams said that SB534, Preserve Telehealth Access Act of 2023, had unanimous support in committee.  

Councilmember Rigg shared the discussion at the Maryland Municipal League Legislative Committee for HB979 sponsored by Delegate Terrasa. The bill would require political candidates to report financial donations and disbursements. MML opposed it. Rigg opposed the opposition. He explained it is a standard in College Park that other municipalities should follow.  

REQUESTS FOR/STATUS OF FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 

None.  

COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE

None.

COMMENTS FROM THE MAYOR, COUNCIL OR CITY MANAGER 

Councilmember Whitney attended the most recent Prince George’s County Municipal Association (PGCMA) meeting on February 23 and said the meeting went well. She mentioned the upcoming meeting with County Executive Alsobrooks, and that PGCMA is asking each municipality to bring forth one issue.  

Councilmember Mackie said COG’s Chesapeake Bay committee has been bombarded by bills about the environment. She expressed her gratitude to the committee for their work researching information. She mentioned her focus on the City OKR on education and that she’s attended an Education Advisory Committee meeting. She acknowledged their work in providing educational opportunities and said they would be coming before Mayor and Council in the future.  

ADJOURN 

CLOSED SESSION AFTER THE MEETING 

Pursuant to the Maryland Annotated Code, General Provisions Article, § 3-305, the Mayor and Council of the City of College Park are providing notice that they will meet in a Closed Session after this meeting to consider:  

1. To discuss the appointment, employment, assignment, promotion, discipline, demotion, compensation, removal, resignation, or performance evaluation of appointees, employees, or officials over whom this public body has jurisdiction; any other personnel matter that affects one or more specific individuals; and 
2. To consult with counsel to obtain legal advice.

Click here to watch the video of the February 28, 2023 meeting. 

Click here to see the agenda for the City of College Park Mayor & Council Hybrid Meeting on March 7, 2023. Tune in, show up or share your thoughts/concerns about the following Presentations and Workshop discussions:

• Consideration of the Board of Elections Supervisors recommendations for the Special Election for the office of Mayor
• Discussion and possible approval of the allocation of a $200,000 grant of ARPA lost revenue funds to the Iron Rooster restaurant to aid the hospitality industry in College Park, subject to Iron Rooster Hospitality, LLC entering into a Beneficiary Agreement.  
• Discussion and possible action on legislation

Haga clic aquí para leer esta publicacion en español.

We, like many of you, are reeling after the arrest of former Mayor Patrick Wojahn and the alleged  charges. We feel disappointed, shocked, heartbroken, sad,  and betrayed. In short, we’re grieving. He’s been the face of College Park for 8 years, and many feel like the rug has been pulled out from under them. The question now is how do we begin to heal?  

While the process will be different for everyone, we believe it starts with listening and empathy. We ask everyone to be gentle with how your neighbors process their feelings about this situation. We expect this situation may be polarizing for some time and that people will make the decisions they need to make in order to cope. However, we hope that members of the community will be respectful of one another and contribute to the healing process. 

We must allow the judicial process to play out.  However, when allegations such as these arise, the biggest victims involved are vulnerable children. We thank all involved in the process of keeping children safe, including the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, the Prince George’s County Police Department, and the State’s Attorney’s Office., 

As adults and community members, it’s part of our job to keep children safe. To that end, please review these resources on recognizing child sexual abuse, what to do if a child discloses sexual abuse, and what to do if you suspect a child may have been abused. Please report local incidents by calling 911 and making a report to the Prince George’s County Child Protective Services Unit. The National Sexual Assault Telephone Hotline can be reached at 1-800-656-HOPE(4673).

Finally, we’ve seen an increase in invectives against the LGBTQ community online and have even received direct emails as Councilmembers. We want to unequivocally state that we reject any attempts to blame isolated acts on a community as a whole, and we pledge to stand with the LGBTQ community through this difficult time.

In closing, please know that regardless of recent events, we will get through this situation. We and City staff are committed to making sure that happens.