Comments are by Councilmembers Llatetra Brown Esters and Susan Whitney and are not approved or sanctioned by the City of College Park.
Click here to watch the video of the City of College Park Mayor & Council Meeting held on November 12, 2025. By going to this link, you can watch the discussion of specific agenda items you are interested in. If you have questions about Council actions and discussions, please email us at lbesters@collegeparkmd.gov and swhitney@collegeparkmd.gov.
CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
Mr. Young said there was a successful closing for the properties purchased at 8807 and 8811 Rhode Island Ave.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Former County Councilmember Danielle Glaros
Former SGA Liaison Dhruvak Mirani
Councilmember-elect Kelly Jordan
PROCLAMATIONS AND AWARDS
1. National Veterans and Military Families Month
2. Municipal Government Works Month
3. Honoring Mr. Lloyd Bondurant 100th Birthday
AMENDMENTS TO AND APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
Councilmember Whitney removed item 25-G-114 from this week’s agenda. Motion seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell.
Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell moved to approve the agenda as amended. Motion seconded by Councilmember Hernandez then approved unanimously.
PUBLIC COMMENT ON CONSENT AGENDA AND NON-AGENDA ITEMS
Richard Biffel, non-resident – said he wanted to talk about nominal consideration for land records. He asked why a deed would cite nominal consideration for a home.
PRESENTATION
Official Report of the 2025 General Election – Susan Huemmrich, Chief Election Supervisor
Ms. Huemmrich presented the official election results for the 2025 General Elections
Mayor – S.M. Fazlul Kabir – 1480 votes -Uncontested race
District 1 – Jacob Hernandez (536) and Alan Hew (492) – Uncontested race
District 2 – Christopher Gill (170), Kelly Jordan (173), Holly Simmons (235)
District 3 – Daniel Oates (360) and Ray Ranker (372) – Uncontested race
District 4 – Maria Mackie (147) and Denise Mitchell (159) – Uncontested race
Total number of eligible voters – 16,146
Total number of persons voting – 1598
Percentage of voting – 9.9%
The business of the election will be done with submission of the financial records of the candidates and when the election is reported to the county. The board wanted to share their appreciation with the staff, candidates, and new and returning officials.
Mayor Kabir thanked City Clerk Yvette Allen for all of her work. He asked if there will be a follow-up work session on the election to discuss what occurred and what can be improved. Ms. Hummerich said the board is working on a presentation that will be brought to council.
CONSENT AGENDA
25-G-113 – Authorization to create a $15,000 pilot program that will provide $100 to single family property owners after they have completed a Home Energy Assessment by a Maryland certified contractor under the Maryland Empower Program. The goal is to incentivize 100 owner-occupied property owners and 50 rental property owners to improve the energy efficiency of their properties by June 30, 2026. – Bill Gardiner, Assistant City Manager and Gary Fields, Finance Director
25-R-11 – Approval of Resolution 25-R-11, a Resolution of the Mayor and Council of the City of College Park Adopting the Recommendation of the Advisory Planning Commission Regarding Variance Application Number CPV-2025-06, located at 5007 Muskogee Street, College Park, to approve a variance from Prince George’s County Zoning Ordinance Section 27-11002 to permit a driveway encroachment in the front yard – Carlos Nunes, Senior Planner and Miriam Bader, Planning Director
25-G-116 – Approval of an amendment to Contract CP-25-25 with Playground Specialist Inc. and authorize additional funding of $75,000.00 from Planning’s Matching Fund budget line 536350 for the Calvert Hills Playground Renovation project, for a total amount of $193,200.00 – Stephanie Anderson, City Attorney, Todd Brown, Contract and Procurement Specialist
25-G-118 – Approval to install a stop sign on Lackawanna Street at the intersection with 48th Place to make the intersection an All-Way Stop – Jacob Vassalotti, GIS Coordinator and Steve Halpern, City Engineer
25-G-119 – Approval of a Business Retention Grant request from the Berwyn Ballet School in the amount of $14,227.01 – Michael Williams, Economic Development Manager
25-G-115 – Approval of Property Use Agreement in support of the transfer of location of a Class A, Beer, Wine and Liquor license from SD Liquors, Inc. t/a Luxe Liquors, 13462 Baltimore Avenue, Laurel Maryland 20707 to Riya Raj, LLC, t/a CP Maryland Liquors, 7324 Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland 20740 – Jatinder Khokhar, Director of Public Services and Stephanie P. Anderson, City Attorney
Councilmember Hernandez moved to approve the Consent Agenda, seconded by Councilmember Esters, then unanimously approved.
PUBLIC HEARING AND POSSIBLE ACTION:
25-O-13 – Ordinance of the Mayor and Council of The City of College Park, amending Chapter 125 “Housing Regulations”, Article I “General Provisions” By Adding § 125-18 to establish the timeframe in which owners must communicate an offer for a successive lease or notice on non-renewal to a current tenant – Jatinder Khokhar, Director of Public Services
Mr. Khokhar introduced the agenda item and said the purpose of the ordinance is to protect the rights of tenants so that if they are in a lease they are not asked to renew a lease prior to 180 days after the lease begins. He asked Ms. Anderson, City Attorney, to speak to any concerns expressed by stakeholders. She said she received a number of direct calls as well as two legal memoranda. She said we will continue with the public hearing this evening.
Dave Dorsh, resident – the rental amendments are unnecessary. He is an owner who wants to keep his property rented all the time. Residents know the terms of the lease. He does not need 180 days or 30 days. Renters know the time they are renting.
Sammy Sied, resident – Landlords pressure tenants to sign their leases just weeks after moving in. He was asked to renew a lease 5 weeks after moving in. He was scrambling to negotiate his living situation and that was stressful. He said he supports the early lease proposal. It prevents landlords from burdening residents.
Gavin Neubauer, resident – he previously lived in the Standard. He was asked to sign a lease two weeks after moving in. When you are asked to sign a lease so early, you do not know the property nor your interest in staying. He currently lives in the Astor where he has 90 days prior to signing. He said the practice is unfair and the legislation fixes it.
Tristan James, resident- the legislation will make the housing process way less stressful on students.
Nisha Kumar, student at UMD and resident of the University View – She said finding housing is a struggle. As soon as they moved in, they were bombarded with correspondence about renewing the lease. They have had issues with maintenance and other issues. She said this situation is challenging for students considering study abroad opportunities. She is being pressured to sign a 12-month lease when she is not going to be there for six months. The complex will not help with subleasing. Students have other matters to focus on.
Biraj, University View resident – He said he is an out of state resident from California. When he entered the common space in his dorm he was approached about where he was going to live moving forward. The predatory practices being implemented adds an unnecessary level of stress.
Avery, resident – received her first correspondence three weeks after moving into off-campus housing. The decision about her lease has been rushed. The View has continued to raise the rent. She feels compelled to resign her lease. She is planning to study aboard. If she signs now, it may prevent her from taking advantage of studying abroad.
Edwin Komoyo, resident – when living on campus, students are given the opportunity to make decisions in February. Living off campus does not afford that opportunity for students to make an informed decision. He asked us to look at the number of students. He urged us to vote for the ordinance.
Avi, resident – he lives in the Union on Knox. He asked to vote in favor of the ordinance. He was asked to sign a lease one month after moving in, and he felt forced to do so.
Hugo Cantu – representative of the Apartment and Office Building Association (AOBA). He said the City of College Park is the first to propose Good Cause language. The general assembly has considered good cause language for the past ten years, and it has yet to pass.
Jefferson Vasquez Reyes – USM Student Council President. He requested a favorable vote on the ordinance. He said common practice pressures students to make decisions prior to understanding their living situation. Housing stability is tied closely to academic achievement. Urged the council to vote favorably,
Ben Wilson, UMD student – urged us to support the early lease ordinance. He said the early timelines directly impact him. The pressures of leasing cause many students to return to campus housing, reducing the amount of housing that is available. The ordinance would offer a simple, but effective solution. It will create predictable housing options.
Amir Hare, UMD student – asked council to support the early lease ordinance. She lives on campus and sees how it impacts her fellow students. It is stressful; finding housing feels like a race instead of a choice. The ordinance will provide fairness to renters.
Jonathan Lierman, resident of College Park Towers – he said two months into the school year they began to hear from their landlord indicating that others were interested in their apartments after it was relisted. It caused premature panic.
Willie Yan, resident of Terrapin Row – He said timing is never perfect. The timeline for resigning leases seems unreasonable. He felt a ton of stress. Financially, he did not know if he would be able to lease his apartment but felt trapped to make a decision. The practice left a bad taste in his mouth.
Jocelyn, resident – she asked council to favor the ordinance. An early lease offer can impact higher rent and place undue burden on students. She believes the ordinance would help to safeguard student civil rights. The first apartment she chose to live in was too expensive. She was stressed and focused on housing instead of her studies.
Adithia, resident – urged the city to favor the ordinance. He has been renting off campus since his sophomore year. Terrapin Row placed pressure on students to renew their lease after living there a month. He experienced the same at Union on Knox.
Imano P. – Not currently living in the city, he is a commuter. He commutes for two hours because he could not sign an early lease. He has a mother who is terminally ill. It is about his future. Early lease offers are predatory, and they should not be standard practice.
John Kaleaf – has lived on and off campus since at UMD. He described a situation where he and his friends were looking for housing near North Campus. They could not find housing and were forced to return to on-campus housing.
Scott Tebbin – lived off campus for past two years. He lived in the Varsity and was asked to renew his lease after a month. He then experienced issues with maintenance.
Richie Kia – Terrapin Row. He moved in on August 28 and started receiving notices to resign the lease by September 12. At this point, he does not know what his living situation will be like next year.
Ovi Pailier, resident – in 2nd year at UMD it has been an interest in moving off campus. but has looked for an alternative living arrangement. The pressure to renew will make it difficult to make a sound decision. The ordinance will alleviate the pressure placed on students
Mace Seamister, UMD student– she is an out-of-state student who is already paying a high price to attend UMD. She lives 3,000 miles away. She currently lives in the South Campus Commons and has until February to decide. Having affordable housing helps to determine her ability to stay at College Park.
Dhruvak Mirani, resident and President of the UMD Student Government Association (SGA); when he co-founded the College Park Tenants Association, the biggest pressure many students dealt with was the pressure placed on then to re-sign leases. He would caution legal counsel from focusing on those who bring forth their own interests.
Caltin Robber, resident and UMD student – opposes the ordinance because it would make housing more difficult to find. Signing their lease early provided them with the opportunity to focus on other things rather than housing. She knows other students in similar situations. The ordinance will leave students scrambling to find housing.
Joanne Prosser, resident – Thanked those who have given their comments. She asked the council to clearly explain how the Maryland Bill of Rights affects this proposed legislation. She said the bill of rights includes updated timelines of when leases should be signed. She believes she is hearing concerns about big development landlords rather than homeowners who are offering space in their homes. She does not want to be held at such restriction.
Sean Woolums- supports a clear ordinance. The proposed ordinance proposes Good Cause legislation. To avoid litigation risk, landlords would be incentivized to renew leases with tenants they do not want to renew.
Lisa Miller – PGPOA President – agrees with what she has heard but believes much of the concern has to do with high rise developments. Not a single person who spoke in favor mentioned the Good Cause components. It should be stricken because it eliminates the good work that has been done to rent to good neighbors. Remove the Good Cause component and the lack of communication.
Lea Dolan, resident – a senior at UMD who rents a single-family home. Understands the concern about those dealing with issues at high rises but opposes this ordinance because it does not allow them to plan ahead. Roommates studied abroad and would have to deal with finding housing. Asked that council amend the legislation.
John Hawvermale – has built and rented homes to students. When he started renting housing, there were not high rises. Now we have a very competitive marketplace with an oversupply of beds. They do not want vacancies. It is not the role of government to tell residents when they can or cannot sign a lease.
Richard Biffel – the earliness of the lease process is driven by renters and not landlords. No one will benefit from this ordinance modeled after a law in Ann Arbor.
Rob Davis – our young people need to learn how to adult. He does not want a government entity telling him how to run his business. The bill needs to be tabled in order to get input. Bring a committee together to discuss and find out what we want to say. Our students do not know that the state cannot do what we are doing. Some of the issues in the ordinance stress him out.
Landlord in College Park – not in favor of the bill, one size does not fit all. He likes to work with the students. We need to let the market work and let free enterprise work. The problems are with the high-density housing.
Andy Miller – over two hundred rentals rent two or more rooms. 100% of the students spoke about high-rise and not single-family homes. Those in single family homes spoke in favor of current practice. You cannot regulate Keynesian economics. Get rid of the first right of refusal.
Peyton McDonald – strong support of the ordinance. Two weeks after moving into their apartment, they were told to sign now or lose their apartment that they paid $5000 for. She was overwhelmed with stress. This ordinance would relieve pressure of early decision. It will provide fairness and get rid of stress.
Yonah Gross, resident – expressed his support for the ordinance. He said he was concerned about manipulative marketing. He said last week was election day. There is more access to councilmembers than just the ballot box. It is all one market. This applies to all of housing – high-rise and single-family homes. If high-rises aren’t full in February and houses are, then people will not have as many choices.
Areliz Perez, resident – She said we need to look at the prospective of the high rise. PGC has a 20-page document that protects the landlord and the renter. There much be 60-day notice before terminating the lease. Asked that a committee be formed to discuss the issues further and look at the high rises.
Gannon Sprinkle, UMD students – co-founder of the College Park Tenants Association. He has spoken with officials of the city, county, state, and the city of Ann Arbor. On all sides, this is great policy. You are holding landlords accountable for their mistakes. This is policy that will calm artificial demand. When the dorms are off the table, off-campus landlords raise rental costs.
25-O-14 – Ordinance of the Mayor and Council of the City of College Park amending City Code Chapter 110-2, “Fees and Penalties – Jatinder Khokhar, Director of Public Services
Mr. Khokhar introduced this item and said penalties were reviewed and were to be raised to no more than $5,000. Staff worked to align the language using feedback from previous meetings. He said if council is ok with proposed changes, staff can take action.
Richard Biffel, non-resident– The riskier you make it to rent in College Park, the higher the cost for renters. There is no evidence that higher penalties deter violations.
Councilmember Rigg moved the amended Ordinance, seconded by Councilmember Whitney
Councilmember Hernandez asked about the maximum being $5000. Councilmember Rigg said the new legislation allows for the maximum. Ms. Anderson said we need to be specific about what is included and passed in the ordinance. Mr. Hernandez asked if Mr. Khokhar believed these changes would assist him and provide the tools needed. Mr. Khokhar said he believed the changes place us in a good position. He said the spirit and intent is not to collect money, but to deter behavior. What we have is on par with surrounding jurisdictions. We should be fair and consistent. Mr. Henandez asked if Mr. Khokar was ok with the amendments. Mr. Khokhar said he was.
Council voted unanimously to move forward with the amended ordinance.
25-O-15 – An Ordinance of the Mayor and Council of the City of College Park Amending Chapter 87 Building Construction § 87-23 “Fences, C. Front Yard Fences., to increase the maximum allowable height of front yard fences from three (3) feet to four (4) feet – Miriam Bader, Director of Planning and Carlos Nunes, Senior Planner
There were no public comments during the public hearing.
Councilmember Hernandez made the motion, seconded by Councilmember Whitney. The ordinance passed unanimously.
WORKSESSION DISCUSSIONS:
Review and discussion of Parking Statutes, Policies and Coinciding Fees and Penalties – Jim Miller, Parking Enforcement Manager
Mr. Miller discussed the five items previously discussed, including permit parking; raising existing parking fines; prohibited vehicle parking and other parking-related matters; increased parking enforcement personnel and consideration to return enforcement to 10pm and possible Sundays; and authorizing a comprehensive citywide parking study to identify problems and possible solutions. He said that parking fees are relatively low compared to other jurisdictions, but he would defer that discussion to a future meeting. There needs to be further clarification on prohibited vehicles, and he would recommend bringing that back for a future discussion. The intent of the prohibited vehicle was not to be so restricted. The increase of parking enforcement staff will be a FY27 budget request. The authorization of the parking study- previously had a mixed response from Council.
Councilmember Rigg said if we do not do something more comprehensive, we will continue to chase our tails. It is not a good use of the staff time. He thinks three permits per home is sufficient.
Councilmember Mackie said it is hard for residents to solicit signatures for permit parking and it causes strife. She said a lot of our roadways are being used as parking lots. We have vehicles stored on our streets that inhibit movement of pedestrians. She said she was in favor of moving forward with these efforts.
Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell said this discussion was timely as we consider our strategic plans. She said she would like the discussion about prohibited parking to come back to council. She said she supported increasing parking enforcement personnel.
Councilmember Whitney said she was generally in favor of all that was presented. She said she has questions about limiting permits to three for each household as there are multigenerational families sharing housing. She said it would be helpful to understand the parking limitations. She said she is not in favor of raising charging for permits but would be in favor of raising parking violation fees and increasing personnel and a comprehensive parking study.
Councilmember Esters thanks staff for their work. She said she was in favor of what was put forth. She said that a comprehensive parking study should be truly comprehensive in nature. She said she appreciated consistency in enforcement but acknowledged that parking issues differ in each neighborhood. Given the differences, it will be difficult to enforce unless there is enough staff and dedicated staff.
Councilmember Hew said we need to determine how many spaces are available to determine enforcement. He agrees with raising fines, agreeing on terms for oversized vehicles, and increasing staff.
Councilmember Hernandez said he was in favor of fair enforcement for our residents. He acknowledged that we have limited parking but said we should not charge for parking passes. For rental properties, we need to identify a way to limit parking passes for single-family homes. He said he insists that we develop a tiered system for increased parking fees. He said he was against restrictions on work vehicles but said there are certain vehicles that should not be in front of homes. Just because there is a decal does not mean that you are in violation. He said he was supportive of more personnel and a comprehensive study.
Councilmember Ranker asked if we know how many homes do not have driveways? Mr. Miller estimated 30%. Councilmember Ranker would like to see a comprehensive study
Councilmember Mackie asked if the study would include residents’ input. Mr. Miller said it will. She said she also does not want individuals charged for registering their vehicles.
Councilmember Hew asked for a rough estimate for the portion of the city that is not permitted – Miller said 60%.
Councilmember Whitney commented that more driveways mean more variances for encroachment and more pavement. We might want to add to the county’s support for permeable pavement.
Mayor Kabir asked about how much time it would take to complete a study. Mr. Miller said he would need to follow up with Mr. Khokhar. Mr. Khokhar said it should take about 3-4months. He said zoning and development are decreasing parking spaces.
Mr. Miller said he was a strong proponent on all items. He said any revenue source should be those who violate regulations.
Prince George’s County Municipal Association (PGCMA) – Kenneth Young, City Manager
Mr. Young introduced this item and explained that the city has not been involved with PGCMA since concerns were raised about the management of membership dues. He introduced Mr. Habas who currently serving as the President of PGCMA.
Mr. Habas said PGCMA has worked to govern themselves and put more structure in place to avoid such things from happening in the future. PGCMA is trying to fill the gap where MML does not give input.
Mayor Kabir said the city had been a member of PGCMA for some time. The association gave us a venue to network and pursue legislative advocacy. He asked about the audit requested. Mr. Habas said there is no benchmark for auditing. MML went through a review process.
Councilmember Esters asked if there has been any consideration given to an external auditor/reviewer. Mr. Habas said there was no standard for such a review.
Councilmember Whitney asked for a standing external organization who would conduct audits and suggested that perhaps another county’s organization could review their books and vice versa.
Councilmember Hernandez asked who found the budget irregularities. Mr. Habas said the former treasurer identified the concern and reported it to MML. Mr. Hernandez said following the report there was a big meeting and he asked if there was ever a public statement by PGCMA. The dues that PGCMA collects come from taxpayers for 27 municipalities. Mr. Habas said the members were informed. What are the dues used for? Mr. Habas said they are trying to catch up so they can fund various activities. Councilmember Hernandez asked if there was a treasurer. Mr. Habas said yes, but they are working to elect a new treasurer. Councilmember Hernandez asked if new bylaws have been approved. Mr. Habas said they had not. Councilmember Hernandez asked if and when PGCMA decides to do an audit, will it be shared with the public.
Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell said as of 2013 the PGCMA bylaws stipulated that audits were to be done on a yearly basis. She asked when the audit stopped. Mr. Habas said 2015. Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell asked what $2,578 dollars are paying for if we do not have a lobbyist. Mr. Habas said PGCMA did not have a lobbyist because there were issues with PGCMA’s lobbyist taking on issues MML is taking a stand on. PGCMA’s lobbyist is only supposed to advocate for county-specific lobbying, which MML does not handle.
Councilmember Hernandez asked if there was a public statement that indicated that the treasurer was no longer an elected official. Mr. Habas asked for the treasurer to be able to speak. Gyasi Gomez said that dues support events and Zoom and Google accounts. The legislative holiday event and the June event at MML are covered by dues. The new due structure is based upon a formula focused on municipal population and base fee.
Mayor Casanas, Vice president of PCGMA, said the PGCMA is a regional chapter of the MML. She said it plays an important role in bringing municipalities together. Under new leadership the organization has introduced new financial structure. Our towns are better when we stand together.
Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell said colleagues still have reservations about moving forward. There remains hesitation to pay membership dues. She asked council what we can ask of them to be more comfortable. Councilmember Hernandez said a public statement about financial discrepancies and investigation, and information outlining what funds will be used for.
Mr. Habas asked for the council decision to be put in writing.
Councilmember Hew asked how this decision will impact our banner city status with MML? Mr. Young said it will have no impact on our status.
REQUESTS FOR / STATUS OF FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Whitney made a motion to update the charge for the Restorative Justice Commission (RJC), seconded by Councilmember Esters. It was unanimously added to the future agenda.
Councilmember Esters made a motion for the RJC to come back to council to present initial priorities related to the recommendations presented to council on October 7, 2025, seconded by Councilmember Whitney. It was unanimously added to the future agenda. Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell asked if we should consider sending another letter about the tax differential to the current County Executive. Mr. Young said they have accounted for all the things we asked for. He does not know if there are any additional areas to ask for, the payback will be low.
COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE
Yonah Gross, resident- said there should be a focus on the conduct of owners toward students as it related to their testimony this evening. He said students were cut off when their time to testify was up, but others were not.
COMMENTS FROM MAYOR, COUNCIL, STUDENT LIAISON OR CITY MANAGER
Councilmember Rigg said he hoped the council sees its way clear to rejoin PGCMA. The city is better when we speak as part of a coalition for the county. He said in the scheme of things it is $2000. He thinks it is meaningful.
Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell said she was glad that CPCUP Education Committee has met. She said they have been meeting to discuss how we engage families in College Park to get them to stay. The committee is working to engage with all the schools in College Park.
Councilmember Whitney said perhaps we can turn off microphone when the time limit is not respected.
Councilmember Esters acknowledged the SGA liaisons for their work in getting students to give voice to the early lease ordinance.
Councilmember Hew said he will be at National League of Cities (NLC) conference next meeting and will be visiting family in Hawaii on December 2.
Councilmember Hernandez said PGCMA does provide platforms. We need to be mindful of the funds we are contributing. There is a question about transparency. He said PGPCS leadership secured their commitment to create a parent organization at Parkdale HS. He spoke with Senator Washington and Delegate Martinez.
Councilmember Mackie said next week is the Maryland Tourism Conference in College Park. She encouraged her Council colleagues to come to the cocktail hour.
SGA Liaison DiSpirito said he was proud of the students who came out to testify. He is proud of the student engagement on the topic.
SGA Liaison Abujuma said she was proud of the students who testified. She said USM is collecting a comprehensive list of food resources in Maryland.
MEETING ADJOURNED
Closed Session
To discuss the appointment, employment, assignment, promotion, discipline, demotion, compensation, removal, resignation, or performance evaluation of appointees, employees, or officials over whom this public body has jurisdiction; any other personnel matter that affects one or more specific individuals.
Councilmember Mackie made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Councilmember Esters.
Click here to see the full agenda for the City of College Park Mayor & Council Hybrid Meeting on November 18. Tune in, show up, or share your thoughts/concerns about the following anticipated Consent Agenda and Action Items, and Work session discussions proposed to be on the agenda that may interest District 2 residents. Please contact us as soon as possible if you need accommodations to participate in a meeting, including language translation:
Consent:
- Authorize the City Manager to execute a Retainer Agreement with O’Malley, Miles, Nylen, & Gilmore, P.A. for lobbying services in 2026 for $30,000
- Resolution to change the charge of the Restorative Justice Commission
Presentations:
- Veo Ride Status Report
- Proposed Student Housing, Pre-application – Article Student Living
- The Mark at College Park, Student Housing, Pre-Application for Preliminary Plan of Subdivision and Detailed Site Plan