Comments are by Councilmembers Llatetra Brown Esters and Susan Whitney and are not approved or sanctioned by the City of College Park.
Click here to watch the video of the City of College Park Mayor & Council Meeting held on May 13, 2025. By going to this link, you can watch the discussion of specific agenda items you are interested in. If you have questions about Council actions and discussions, please email us at lbesters@collegeparkmd.gov and swhitney@collegeparkmd.gov.
CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
Mr. Young said the city will hold its first ever Spring Street Fair on Sunday, May 18 from 1-4pm at Davis Hall on 51st Ave. He said there will be road closures starting at 10am. The event will include live entertainment, cooking demonstrations, and arts and crafts.
Councilmember Mackie asked whether the last cleanup of Spring will be held on May 17, 2025. Mr. Young confirmed the cleanup on May 17.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Mark Shroder, former District 1 councilmember
Maxine Gross, former District 2 councilmember
PROCLAMATIONS AND AWARDS
A. Kids to Parks Day
B. Bike to Workday
C. National Public Works Week
D. Building Safety Month
E. Teacher Appreciation Week
AMENDMENTS TO AND APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
Councilmember Ranker made a motion to move agenda item 25-G-51 (Proposal to add ParkMobile as “Pay by Cell” service) from the Consent Agenda to the Action Agenda.
Council Whitney made a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Councilmember Hernandez seconded.
CONSENT AGENDA
25-G-50 Reappointment of Arelis Pérez to the Housing Authority for a five-year term to expire on May 1, 2030.
25-G-52 Approval of a letter of support to the University of Maryland’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering for their Safe Streets and Roads for All planning grant application to the Department of Transportation – Rakhmel Rafi, Grants Coordinator
Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda, seconded by Councilmember Mackie. The Consent Agenda was unanimously approved.
PRESENTATIONS:
A. Employee of the Year Award – Jorge Arturo Lopez – Garcia
B. Farewell to Erica Otte, Student Liaison and Anna-Kaye McDonald, Deputy Student Liaison
PUBLIC HEARING AND POSSIBLE ACTION:
25-O-02 Ordinance 25-O-02 an Ordinance of the Mayor and Council of the City of College Park, Amending Chapter 184, “Vehicles and Traffic”, by Enacting Article IX ‘Stop Sign Monitoring, Systems §184-46 Systems on Highways Located in a School Zone Maintained by a Local Jurisdiction and Systems on State Highways Located in a School Zone as authorized by §21-707.1- of the Transportation Article, Annotated Code of Maryland and schedule the Public Hearing for Tuesday, May 13, 2025 – Jatinder Khokhar, Director of Public Services and Stephanie Anderson, City Attorney
Mr. Khokhar said legislation for a stop sign monitoring system was discussed by Council on March 18 during a worksession and came back to the Council for public hearing today. He said the city is authorized by legislation to use stop sign monitoring systems on local streets in school zones. Several municipalities in Prince Georges County have passed legislation related to the use of stop sign monitoring. Mr. Khokhar referred to the language added to amend Chapter 184 of city code for consideration.
Mark Shroder- resident and Chair of Bike Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) – The committee received the presentation from the vendor and were favorably impressed. They felt that stop sign monitoring would be a good safety mechanism. However, they are concerned about privacy issues since pedestrians, not just drivers, could be identified. He asked that we find a way to obscure the photos of individuals before adopting the system.
Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell asked if we have information from the vendor indicating that individuals’ images can be obscured. Ms. Anderson said she will follow up to find out what can be done. She said normally, cameras can be adjusted to view vehicles only.
Mackie asked if footage captured by the cameras would be publicly available, and Kenny said it would not.
Councilmember Rigg made the motion, seconded by Councilmember Esters. and it passed unanimously.
Councilmember Rigg said we have talked about it for a while and there is general acceptance. Tonight was the first time we have received a negative comment. We want to encourage pedestrian safety. He thinks it is proper and fitting for us to move forward tonight.
ACTION ITEMS:
25-G-51 Proposal to Add ParkMobile as a “Pay by Cell” service provider to the City’s Parking portfolio – Jim Miller, Parking Enforcement Manager
Mr. Miller – discussion of Park Mobile as a pay by cell system. Here to answer questions.
Councilmember Ranker said we do not know how many people will use this service versus other options. He asked if all the revenue went through ParkMobile how that would impact the city. Mr. Miller said if all 2024 payments had gone through ParkMobile, it would have added $16,000.24 to the City’s costs. If all mobile app transactions for 2024 had been made via ParkMobile, rather than AIMS, it would have cost the City an additional $5,203.
Councilmember Ranker said he is opposed to something that costs the city more money and brings in less revenue.
Councilmember Hew asked if we already had Park Mobile. Mr. Miller said no, we used to have Mobile Now. He said when COVID hit, Mobile Now shut down within hours. AIMs parking, our current vendor, offered their mobile app during COVID for the same charge as Mobile Now. The university uses ParkMobile, and they are highly engaged in the area. We have people who attempt to use their ParkMobile numbers in AIMS zone.
Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell said this is not intended to bring in more revenue, it is to help make things more convenient.
Councilmember Whitney said as long as we maintain the other options for payment, we are just increasing the choice and options for residents.
Councilmember Whitney made a motion to approve, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell.
Gabe Newbow, UMD student – Uses both apps. He said there are issues with Aims, including the fact you can only use the app once per day. He said ParkMobile will be easier and will provide better alerts.
Vote – 7:1 (Ranker opposed)
WORKSESSION DISCUSSIONS
B. Lakeland Neighborhood Plan – Carlos Nunes, Senior Planner
Mr. Nunes introduced the discussion and said the Lakeland Plan was an initiative designed to restore history and identity while helping to move the community forward. The plan was developed over the course of 18 months with College Park, activists, and community members. He mentioned the connection between the Lakeland Plan and 15-minute neighborhood report heard last week. Mr. Nunes mentioned tangible aspects of the plan, including Pierce Park.
Ms. Bader said there will be reengagement with the Partnership for Action Learning in Sustainability (PALS) program regarding the Pierce Park. She mentioned recent engagement with a landscape architect who does trauma-informed design. The class starts in the fall and the idea is to design a meditation garden and a garden that would serve the community. Public Works will also set up picnic tables on the property. Dr. Naomi Sach’s class will focus on therapeutic landscaping. Ten graduate students will take the course, and each student will design their own solution for creating a therapeutic garden. The concepts would then be brought to the Restorative Justice Commission (RJC). In addition, there could be a Unity Farm, a garden grown in the community and offered back to the community. The Community Center could offer gardening classes, and all ages would be involved.
Mr. Nunes said the key recommendations in the plan include affordable mixed-use housing, flood mitigation, green space reuse, and multi-modal transportation uses. Recommendations related to zoning and land use focus on creating better transition, upzoning to allow for commercial zoning, down zoning to decrease density as development approaches single family homes. Another recommendation is the creation of a cultural heritage district that will have new zoning to honor Black cultural heritage and encourage memorialization and adaptive use.
Mr. Nunes said the next steps for the plan would be City Council adoption.
Councilmember Esters thanked Mr. Nunes and Ms. Bader for their work with the community and said the plan has been a long time coming. She mentioned the concerns of the community as they see more and more development. She said once adopted the plan will provide insight into how the community seeks to move forward.
Councilmember Whitney thanked Mr. Nunes for his work and said we have attended many meetings where the community have talked about their needs. She said there have been difficult discussions and planning for what the community can be moving forward. This plan represents their goals. She asked where the flood prone area is in Lakeland that is not currently open space. Ms. Bader said she would get back to us.
Councilmember Hew said he appreciated the plans but asked about a goldfish pond given their history in the community. Ms. Bader said goldfish have been considered.
Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell talked about feeling emotional. She said Council has talked about this for so long it warms her heart to see the actual plan. She said she was thinking about those who have lived there for so long and said timing is everything. She said we are moving forward with something that was inclusive of everyone.
Councilmember Rigg said when he read the report he was surprised to see the recommendation for downzoning. It was a good though to give more structure. He asked about the economics of downzoning given the assumption the owners of the land would be opposed. Ms. Bader said the plan is visionary and provides guidance to the process as we do not have zoning authority.
Ms. Bader mentioned Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) in College Park homes. She said the Age-Friendly College Park Workgroup will share ideas for homeowners to rent to students which could provide affordable housing for students and income and support for the homeowners. She said there is legislation at the state level that require us to come up with a plan for ADUs.
Councilmember Rigg said he would like to see Old Town and Lakeland considered for any plans related to the ADUs. He thanked staff and the community for their work on this. He said he is excited by the work, which is fundamentally hopeful. He said we did not know what to do, but this is something that has formed a vision imagining Lakeland as it will be in the future.
Councilmember Hernandez mentioned property recently acquired in Lakeland and hoping to see plans for that property. Ms. Bader informed him that it is Pierce Ave, which is where the park discussed early is being considered.
Councilmember Esters asked for the rules to be suspended to allow community members who were present an opportunity to talk about the plan.
Ms. Maxine Gross thanked the Council and the community for going through this tedious process. She said once this is accepted it will help set the course for the community moving forward. She thanked the individuals at the University of Maryland for the PALs program. She said the students were able to imagine things that we did not consider. She said the question did arise about how this plan connects with the Restorative Justice Commission (RJC). The project involves making plans, generating ideas, and dreaming.
Mr. Robert Thurston said he wanted to reiterate what had been said. He thanked Council and staff for their work and the hours given up for the Lakeland plan. He said Mr. Valentine was instrumental in this process and Mr. Nunes brought it to fruition. Hopefully, this can be a benchmark for the rest of the city. They are happy there is now a front-facing document that can be used as developers come along.
Nick Aspiro, student – asked about the age-friendly task force for more affordable housing.
Mr. Young said the Lakeland Plan will be added to the consent agenda for adoption next week.
A. 25-O-04 – Ordinance of the Mayor and Council of the City of College Park, Maryland to adopt the Fiscal Year 2026 General Fund, ARPA Allocation Fund, Debt Service Fund, and Capital Projects Fund budgets for the City of College Park – Gary Fields, Finance Director
Mr. Fields said staff were looking for Council to come to consensus about what to put forward for adoption next week.
Mr. Young said Council should concentrate on the preferences of what to include in the budget and allow staff to balance the numbers.
Mr. Fields said residents have asked about the 25% reserve amount. He said it is the minimum amount that is required for a good bond rating. Having something above the bond rating requirement is preferable.
Councilmember Rigg suggested we think about each proposal as a package to understand rationale.
Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell asked us to consider those items for which there is no consensus instead of going line by line.
Councilmember Hernandez said he tried to thread the needle between those who do not want to spend the fund balance and meeting the needs of our residents. He asked for funding to support initiatives to engage Spanish-speaking residents. Hollywood asked for funding to fill a funding gap for their tutoring program. He also pitched the use for resourcing money allotted to Meals on Wheels that would not be used. He sought to increase funding for sidewalks and fund two different economic development programs that would be underfunded. In terms of public safety, he said residents feel that public safety is in question.
Councilmember Ranker – Overall, he thought there were great suggestions made by Councilmember Hernandez, but he wanted to have more emergency funding available. He would also like to eliminate the proposed Deputy City Manager to reduce costs.
Councilmember Whitney said she is under the impression that there are those who are conversative in their spending and tried to strike a balance. She said perhaps we can understand what the fiscal situation is after the special session. She said she is not in favor of starting new programs as part of the budget session, saying doing so in the past has been confusing for residents. She said we can help everyone with increasing the emergency assistance funds.
Councilmember Esters thanked her colleagues for their proposals but said she would like to move forward with the proposed budget put forth by the City Manager. She said we have heard over several months that things would be tight for this budget and she does not think it is in our best interest to spend more than the proposed budget given uncertainties at the federal and state level. She mentioned we will not know our situation until after the state’s special budget session.
Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell said if it comes down to making a decision, she must be very conservative. At the county level it is not a pretty sight. She is still listening but must be conservative.
Councilmember Hew said he was more on the conservative side as mentioned by Councilmembers Esters and Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell. He said there is much uncertainty.
Councilmember Mackie said she tends to be fiscally conservative and thinks that our spending should be put on hold. For her, cutting and then spending is not the best way. She thinks we should cut and wait.
Ms. Anderson reminded Council action was not to be taken, Council just needed to gain consensus.
Councilmember Rigg asked whether the $400,000 from MOW could be used in FY26? Mr. Fields said when funds are not used it goes back to fund balance. Mr. Young said they can be used and said the use of the money would be replacing the revenue with an expense. Mr. Fields said Council planned to spend it in FY25.
Councilmember Hernandez asked how much the fund balance was in FY25? What percentage were we at last year? Mr. Fields said we were at 39.7% in FY25. If we use only the $731,000.00, we will be at 36% at the end of this fiscal year. He said what is being proposed by the City Manager is no use of fund balance.
Councilmember Hernandez said there are two programs regarding economic development and asked if there is a preferred program. Mr. Young said the business façade serves a lot more businesses while business retention may only serve a few.
Councilmember Whitney said there is anticipation of restaurants going out of business due to what is happening at the federal level. We may lose some of those in this climate.
Mr. Young said our situation in College Park is a bit different than other areas because they rely on 8 months of revenue.
Further discussion among Council led to a consensus to Course of Action (COA) 6 as proposed by Councilmember Whitney.
Mr. Fields confirmed that Council would be looking at COA6 as is but may consider amendments at the next meeting, where Council must pass a budget.
Mr. Young said we do have a contingency fund if we do decide to fund any of the programs. Mr. Fields confirmed we do have contingency dollars.
25-G-49: Discussion of Legislative Action Request to the Maryland Municipal League –Bill Gardiner, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Gardiner led the discussion on Legislative Action Requests. Each year, MML asks members to propose legislation that it may approve as MML priority.
During the discussion, Mr. Gardiner mentioned the following for consideration:
- HB178 (as introduced in 2025) would have prohibited blocking bike lanes. The Washington Area Bicyclist Association intends to advocate for it in 2026.
- Gaithersburg is considering a request that the state provide exemption for local governments that provide equal or greater benefits to those benefits required by FMLA. Without exemption, municipalities and employees could end up paying into two systems and employees could access both benefits at different times.
- Gaithersburg is also considering a request to allow municipalities to appeal an assessment by SDAT if property sales or income reports show an increase in values of more than 20% above the current assessed value.
Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell said she was interested in the LAR regarding an appeal of assessments by SDAT. She asked if that would also include notification to municipalities about assessment changes. She said we should expound upon that. She said she believes notification should be part of the mandate.
Councilmember Whitney asked if this would just be for commercial property or both commercial and residential apartments. She said she was all for not blocking bike lanes and said we needed to specify that delivery vehicles should not be excluded because they are a big part of the problem.
Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell asked if right of first refusal for vacant and blighted has been discussed.
Councilmember Mackie asked to confirm that there had been outreach to the 21st Delegation about priorities. Mr. Gardiner said there has been outreach but the city has yet to hear about firm priorities.
Councilmember Hew suggested modified mufflers be additional legislation.
Councilmember Whitney asked if staff knew the three locations in the county that received the noise cameras.
Mr. Gardiner said for LARs to be sent to MML we can recommend the bike lanes and the request for property tax appeals if a sale demonstrates a property is undervalued.
Councilmember Ranker asked if there is something that Municipalities advocate for related to higher standards for bike lanes. Mr. Young said Route 1 is a right-of-way, but land acquisition is huge. We do not have the width without impacting business. The primary issue was less about state standards and more to do with related expenses.
Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell – MML is only going to deal with LARs that will benefit all state municipalities. Which is why we have lobbyists to deal with our own issues. A letter will be on Consent agenda next week.
REQUESTS FOR / STATUS OF FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Whitney said originally there was the introduction of an ordinance prohibiting stopping or standing in a bike lane at tonight’s meeting. She would like to make sure it will be on the agenda for next week. Ms. Allen said it will be on the agenda for next week.
Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell said she will put forth request for an audit process for organizations that receive money from the City.
COMMENTS FROM THE MAYOR, COUNCIL, STUDENT LIAISON OR CITY MANAGER
Councilmember Mackie said she attended the kickoff for senior activities at the College Park Woods Clubhouse. She gave a shoutout to the members of the Seniors Committee for their work.
Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell thanked the city and Councilmember Mackie for bringing Care Solace to the Council. She had the opportunity to talk to Care Solace about their benefits. She reminded residents that this is resource that is free and about keeping them whole. She said they should reach out and make the call if they need assistance.
Councilmember Hew said he attended the Berwyn Ballet. He said it was inspiring to see children learn about performing arts and culture. He said it was a great asset to our city and hopes for more opportunities to participate.
Councilmember Hernandez thanked staff for their work on making Friday Night Live a success. He also congratulated Taqueria Habanero on the re-opening of their restaurant.
Mayor Pro Tem made the motion to adjourn, seconded by Councilmember Hew.
MEETING ADJOURNED
Click here to see the full agenda for the City of College Park Mayor & Council Hybrid Meeting on May 20, 2025. Tune in, show up or share your thoughts/concerns about the following anticipated Consent Agenda and Action Items, and Workshop discussions proposed to be on the agenda that may interest District 2 residents. Please contact us as soon as possible if you need accommodations to participate in a meeting, including language translation:
Consent
- Adoption of the Lakeland Neighborhood Plan
Presentations
- Recognition of Outstanding Essayists in the “If I Were Mayor, I Would” essay contest.
- Age-Friendly College Park
Action
- Adoption of Budget for Fiscal Year 2026
Worksession
- Ordinance to Amend Chapter 184 to prohibit parking or standing in a bike lane.